1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.480061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product quantum-state-dependent anisotropies in photoinitiated unimolecular decomposition

Abstract: Angular distributions of state-selected NO and O products in the photoinitiated unimolecular decomposition of jet-cooled NO 2 have been measured by using both the photofragment ion imaging technique with velocity map imaging and ion time-of-flight translational spectroscopy. The recoil anisotropy parameter of the photofragments, ␤, depends strongly on the rotational angular momentum of the photoproduct. O( 3 P jϭ2,0 ) angular distributions are recorded at photolysis wavelengths 371.7, 354.7, and 338.9 nm. At t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
57
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
9
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the main part of the rotational distribution, it decreases slowly with increasing j, and the behavior is essentially the same on the A and B surfaces. This slow change arises from the increased torque felt by molecules dissociating to higher j, and its basic physics is captured by the empirical models used by Demyanenko et al 46 and Brouard et al 3 In the upper part of the rotational distribution, representing only excitation to the A state followed by transitions to X, the deflection angle changes more steeply for the same reason.…”
Section: Alignment Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the main part of the rotational distribution, it decreases slowly with increasing j, and the behavior is essentially the same on the A and B surfaces. This slow change arises from the increased torque felt by molecules dissociating to higher j, and its basic physics is captured by the empirical models used by Demyanenko et al 46 and Brouard et al 3 In the upper part of the rotational distribution, representing only excitation to the A state followed by transitions to X, the deflection angle changes more steeply for the same reason.…”
Section: Alignment Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Angular distributions. ET-dependent anisotropy parameters derived from fitting the I and I* angular distributions are shown in Figure 2 and where χ is defined as the angle between the transition dipole moment, μ̂, and the Jacobi vector between the departing I atom and the center of mass of the CHICl radical, R. 79 CHI2Cl belongs to the Cs point group; the plane of symmetry is defined as the x-y plane, as depicted in Figure 6. The transition dipole moments lie within the x-y plane for excitation to A′ states and along the z-axis for excitation to A″ states.…”
Section: ( Tvuv ) = 1 ( Ti ) + 2 ( Ti * )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The components v y and v z of the final O atom velocity were obtained as described in Ref. 34, using the final orientation angle φ R of the R vector obtained through angular momentum constraints 35 propagated along the trajectory. No special procedures were needed to compute β from the surface hopping trajectories, except to check for possible artifacts as described below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude that the observed average values of β, substantially lower than the limiting value of 2 that would be expected for axial recoil from a linear initial configuration, appear largely because of nonaxial recoil due to the strong bending forces in the excited state. (We use the term "nonaxial recoil" to indicate final velocities that are not parallel to the initial direction of the breaking bond, rather than adopting the usage of Demyanenko et al 35 who apply it to velocities that are not parallel to the R vector late in the dissociation. )…”
Section: A Average Values Of βmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation