2018
DOI: 10.14434/ijdl.v1i1.917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Producing the Rigorous Design Case

Abstract: Producing a rigorous design case, and producing a case that holds utility for designers are not always one and the same act. The differences between rigor and utility in design cases are discussed in this article, as well as the position of the design case in the broader realm of naturalistic research. Drawing from naturalistic and action research, possible standards of rigor for cases emerge. These are presented and related to the representation of design knowledge. The article then presents issues observed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tall. Exceptions exist-particularly in courses focused on multimodal production (see Shipka, 2011) and in situations where material conditions restrict the availability of paper (see Prendergast & Ličko, 2009)-but computer-composed text printed or photocopied onto U.S. letter-sized paper has a long history in composition classrooms. Building on this tradition, the instructor of the course described here set course policies and designed learning activities that required students to submit their written work electronically via a learning management system no fewer than 5 hours before the scheduled class meeting time-a practice that afforded the instructor time to review submissions, select useful examples, and print paper copies to review in class.…”
Section: Why Paper?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tall. Exceptions exist-particularly in courses focused on multimodal production (see Shipka, 2011) and in situations where material conditions restrict the availability of paper (see Prendergast & Ličko, 2009)-but computer-composed text printed or photocopied onto U.S. letter-sized paper has a long history in composition classrooms. Building on this tradition, the instructor of the course described here set course policies and designed learning activities that required students to submit their written work electronically via a learning management system no fewer than 5 hours before the scheduled class meeting time-a practice that afforded the instructor time to review submissions, select useful examples, and print paper copies to review in class.…”
Section: Why Paper?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14434/ijdl.v8i2.23744 2017 | Volume 8, Issue 2 | Pages 149-159 online course was shaped by cycles of iterations (Boling, 2010;Howard, 2011;Smith 2010).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a design case, the aim of this paper is to aid the dissemination of this kind of knowledge (Boling, 2010). According to Smith (2010), the ultimate utility of a design case is determined by those who use it.…”
Section: Volume 7 Issue 3 | Pages 95-104mentioning
confidence: 99%