Producer cities and consumer cities: Using production- and consumption-based carbon accounts to guide climate action in China, the UK, and the US

Abstract

a b s t r a c tMeeting the commitments made in the Paris Agreement on climate change will require different approaches in different countries. However, a common feature in many contexts relates to the continued and sometimes increasing significance of the carbon footprints of urban centres. These footprints consider both production or territorial (i.e. Scope 1 and 2) emissions, and consumption or extraterritorial (i.e. Scope 3) emissions. Although a growing number of cities have adopted targets for their production-based emissions, very few have even started to analyse or address their consumption-based emissions. This presents a potential challenge for urban policymaking if consumption emissions rise while production emissions fall, and for climate mitigation more broadly if emissions are effectively migrating to areas without carbon reduction targets or capabilities. To explore these issues, in this paper we analyse and compare production-and consumption-based emissions accounts for urban centres in China, the UK and the US. Results show that per-capita income and population density are strong predictors of consumption-based emissions levels, and consumption-based emissions appear to diminish but not decouple with higher per-capita incomes. In addition, results show that per-capita income is a predictor of net emissions -or the difference between production-and consumption-based accountssuggesting that continuing increases in per capita income levels may drive the 'leakage' of urban emissions. These findings highlight a risk in placing too much faith in city-level climate strategies focused only on production-based emissions, and stress the importance of new city-level initiatives that focus on consumption-based emissions, especially in cities that are shifting from producer to consumer city status.

Determinants of Oil Footprints Embodied in Sino-US Trade: A Perspective from the Globalizing World

“…[5]. For example, Liu et al, calculated China's carbon emissions [38], and Sudmant et al, calculated agricultural CH 4 and N 2 O emissions of major global economies [39]. With the continuous deepening of research, the application field of MRIO has been continuously expanded.…”

Upscaling urban data science for global climate solutions

“…Hence, it includes the global GHG emissions in the supply chain of products finally consumed within the urban territory and leaves out export-related GHG emissions. Consumption-based GHG estimates have been rare, but more recently a growing number of studies have been published (Chavez & Ramaswami, 2011; Heinonen et al , 2011; Sudmant et al , 2018) and some have even provided estimates for local administrative units across counties (Minx et al , 2013) or metropolitan areas (Minx et al , 2009; Jones & Kammen, 2014).…”

Planning and financing urban development in the context of the climate crisis

“…The IPCC special report on 1.5°C in particular identifies urban and infrastructure systems as one of four key systems that needs to reach net-zero emissions by mid-century, alongside energy, land use and industrial systems (de Coninck et al 2018). Today, cities account for 71-76% of carbon dioxide emissions from final energy use (Seto et al 2014), and likely an even larger share if consumption-based carbon accounting is used (Sudmant et al 2018). One can argue that urban decision-makers and built environment professionals have primary responsibility for driving the transition to a low-carbon, climate-resilient economy.…”