2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.06.03.494742
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing UMI Datasets at High Accuracy and Efficiency with the Sentieon ctDNA Analysis Pipeline

Abstract: Liquid biopsy enables identification of low allele frequency (AF) tumor variants and novel clinical applications such as minimum residual disease (MRD) monitoring. However, challenges remain, primarily due to limited sample volume and low read count of low-AF variants. Because of the low AFs, some clinically significant variants are difficult to distinguish from errors introduced by PCR amplification and sequencing. Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) have been developed to further reduce base error rates and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw reads were trimmed with Fastp with high‐quality standards (at least 30% of bases have quality above Q30) 21 . UMIs were then extracted from both ends of reads and aligned to hg19 reference genome using Sentieon UMI pipeline 27 . Reads belonging to the same UMI family group were merged into a consensus read with base quality adjusted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raw reads were trimmed with Fastp with high‐quality standards (at least 30% of bases have quality above Q30) 21 . UMIs were then extracted from both ends of reads and aligned to hg19 reference genome using Sentieon UMI pipeline 27 . Reads belonging to the same UMI family group were merged into a consensus read with base quality adjusted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 21 UMIs were then extracted from both ends of reads and aligned to hg19 reference genome using Sentieon UMI pipeline. 27 Reads belonging to the same UMI family group were merged into a consensus read with base quality adjusted. Quality control was performed after reads alignment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some pipelines opt for separate consensus generation and variant calling tools, offering more flexibility and easier adaptation to new data types. Popular consensus generation tools include “Fgbio” 14 , “Picard” 15 , “Gencore” 16 , and Sentieon’s UMI analyzing pipeline 17 . Fgbio is typically applied to datasets with UMIs, Picard serves as a traditional deduplication tool, selecting reads with the best quality score as group representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wells et al combined experimental procedures with bioinformatics analysis to reduce the number of PCR/sequencing artifacts upon integration site identification (Wells et al, 2020). Lastly, a recent work also makes use of UMI-tag to achieve to quantify small somatic variant calling from ctDNA sequencing data (Hu et al, 2022). Still, there is to date no systematic comparative evaluation of a UMI-based system against fragment-based methods for abundance quantification in the context of insertion site retrieval using a set of controlled “real-world” scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%