2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21227550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing Strategy and Comparative Performance of Different Mobile LiDAR System Grades for Bridge Monitoring: A Case Study

Abstract: Collecting precise as-built data is essential for tracking construction progress. Three-dimensional models generated from such data capture the as-is conditions of the structures, providing valuable information for monitoring existing infrastructure over time. As-built data can be acquired using a wide range of remote sensing technologies, among which mobile LiDAR is gaining increasing attention due to its ability to collect high-resolution data over a relatively large area in a short time. The quality of mobi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, an image-assisted coarse registration of the LiDAR scans is conducted wherein successive images are utilized to obtain scan-toscan transformation through constrained iterative matching of the scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) features in two successive images at a time. Once the LiDAR scans are coarsely registered, a final optimization routine based on least squares adjustment is initiated for a feature-based fine registration of all scans [31]. Finally, to compute the stockpile volume, the fine registered point clouds are leveled with the ground surface, and the boundary of the salt pile is defined.…”
Section: Overview Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an image-assisted coarse registration of the LiDAR scans is conducted wherein successive images are utilized to obtain scan-toscan transformation through constrained iterative matching of the scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) features in two successive images at a time. Once the LiDAR scans are coarsely registered, a final optimization routine based on least squares adjustment is initiated for a feature-based fine registration of all scans [31]. Finally, to compute the stockpile volume, the fine registered point clouds are leveled with the ground surface, and the boundary of the salt pile is defined.…”
Section: Overview Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to derive a fine-registered point cloud, planar feature matching is first conducted to establish corresponding features among all scans/stations. Finally, a planar feature-based LSA is adopted for simultaneous fine registration of all scans at all stations while solving for the parameters of the best-fitting planes using the approach proposed by Lin et al [31]. The fine registration results for the scans at the two stations in the Rensselaer dataset are shown…”
Section: A Initial Point Cloud Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies conducted feature-based registration by deploying special targets (e.g., highly reflective checkerboards and/or spherical targets) in the study site and then identifying them in different point clouds [23][24][25][26]. In order to increase the level of automation, several target-less registration approaches have been proposed that rely on natural geometric features (e.g., planar patches or linear features) in the area of interest [27][28][29][30][31]. For instance, Lin et al [27] extracted and matched planar, linear, and cylindrical features from point clouds acquired near a bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to increase the level of automation, several target-less registration approaches have been proposed that rely on natural geometric features (e.g., planar patches or linear features) in the area of interest [27][28][29][30][31]. For instance, Lin et al [27] extracted and matched planar, linear, and cylindrical features from point clouds acquired near a bridge. Extracted conjugate features were then used in a LSA engine for the derivation of registration and feature parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%