2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-03275-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing strategies for single point incremental forming—a CAM approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first type is SPIF; the principle of carrying it out is shown in Figure 3 a. The tool is guided by the machine control system along a pre-programmed trajectory, causing incremental deformation of the sheet [ 39 , 40 ]. A variation of SPIF (Figure 4a) is TPIF, which can be performed with the use of a partial die ( Figure 3 b) or a specific matrix ( Figure 3 c).…”
Section: Incremental Sheet Forming Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type is SPIF; the principle of carrying it out is shown in Figure 3 a. The tool is guided by the machine control system along a pre-programmed trajectory, causing incremental deformation of the sheet [ 39 , 40 ]. A variation of SPIF (Figure 4a) is TPIF, which can be performed with the use of a partial die ( Figure 3 b) or a specific matrix ( Figure 3 c).…”
Section: Incremental Sheet Forming Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no specific type of technological equipment that is widely accepted for the SPIF process, given that this process is relatively new. The literature mentions the use of four types of technological equipment, namely: articulated industrial robots [6], parallel robotic structures [7], CNC milling machines [8] or specially designed forming machines [9].…”
Section: Fig 1 Spif Process Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAM software systems offer multiple solutions similar to those used in milling that can be successfully implemented also for the toolpath in SPIF processes. Literature features various solutions of two or multiple stage toolpaths that can be implemented for different part shapes [7,13]. The inconvenience in using two or multiple forming paths is that, usually, from one stage to another part deviations should be measured in order to be compensated in the next forming stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%