2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing speed, working memory, and executive functions: Independent or inter-related predictors of general intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
64
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
4
64
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we used a neurocognitive psychometrics account of mental speed to decompose the association between age differences and fluid intelligence. Reanalyzing data from two previously published datasets (Frischkorn et al 2019;Schubert et al 2017), we investigated whether individual differences in diffusion model parameters and in ERP latencies associated with higher-order attentional processing explained the negative association between age differences and fluid intelligence. Moreover, we investigated if the phenomenon that age does not account for the association between processing speed and intelligence can be generalized to electrophysiological and model-based measures of processing speed.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this purpose, we used a neurocognitive psychometrics account of mental speed to decompose the association between age differences and fluid intelligence. Reanalyzing data from two previously published datasets (Frischkorn et al 2019;Schubert et al 2017), we investigated whether individual differences in diffusion model parameters and in ERP latencies associated with higher-order attentional processing explained the negative association between age differences and fluid intelligence. Moreover, we investigated if the phenomenon that age does not account for the association between processing speed and intelligence can be generalized to electrophysiological and model-based measures of processing speed.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Schubert et al (2017), conditions were presented blockwise with 10 practice and 100 experimental trials each and the order of conditions was counterbalanced across participants. In the study by Frischkorn et al (2019), conditions were presented blockwise with 10 practice and 40 experimental trials each and the order of conditions was kept constant across participants. The Posner letter matching task consisted of two conditions: The physical identity (PI) condition, in which participants had to decide whether two letters were physically identical, and the name identity (NI) condition, in which participants had to decide whether two letters were semantically identical.…”
Section: Experimental Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, experimentally validated difference score measures of cognitive control are often task-specific, show low reliabilities, and show little variation between individuals (Gärtner & Strobel, 2019;Hedge et al, 2018;Rey-Mermet et al, 2018;Rouder & Haaf, 2019). For these reasons, correlations between difference score measures of cognitive control and fluid intelligence are typically lower than those of mean performance measures and often fail to reach statistical significance at all (e.g., Friedman et al, 2006;Frischkorn et al, 2019;Rey-Mermet et al, 2019).…”
Section: Limitations Of Behavioral Measures Of Cognitive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we used a neurocognitive psychometrics account of mental speed to decompose the association between age differences and fluid intelligence. Reanalyzing data from two previously published datasets [51,63], we investigated whether individual differences in diffusion model parameters and in ERP latencies associated with higher-order attentional processing explained the negative association between age differences and fluid intelligence. Moreover, we investigated if the phenomenon that age does not account for the association between processing speed and intelligence can be generalized to electrophysiological and model-based measures of processing speed.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%