Abstract:Semlmembranosus muscles from paired sides-electrically stimulated (ES) and not-stimulated (NES)-of mature cows were used to determine effects of certain postmortem treatments (state of rigor/temnerature) and of ES on nrocessinz uronerties. ES decreased (PO.O5) values for total protein or juice loss during cooking. State of rigor/temperature treatment affected pH and salt-soluble protein (SSP) values more than did… Show more
“…There is generally little problem with tenderness in a restructured product, so most of the increases in Kramer shear values have been attributed to increased binding ability of the meat proteins. These results , 1982a;Choi et al, 1984). When comparing mixing vs tumbling, or CB vs HB, no (P>O.OS) influence on the binding ability of the meat proteins was found.…”
Paired sides of 20 steer carcasses were used to determine the effects of electrical stimulation (ES), hot-boning (HB), and mixing vs tumbling on the physical and chemical properties of restructured beef logs. Proximate analysis data showed HB to increase water-holding capacity and ash content over cold-boning (CB). Electrical stimulation increased peak force (PF) values over nonstimulation (NS), but there was no difference in the distance to peak force (DPF) values or energy values, indicating a slight improvement in binding ability with ES. Electrical simulation and HB increased binding ability of the meat proteins. Results of this study suggest that tumbling should be used with HB and mixing should be used with CB to reduce moisture losses.
“…There is generally little problem with tenderness in a restructured product, so most of the increases in Kramer shear values have been attributed to increased binding ability of the meat proteins. These results , 1982a;Choi et al, 1984). When comparing mixing vs tumbling, or CB vs HB, no (P>O.OS) influence on the binding ability of the meat proteins was found.…”
Paired sides of 20 steer carcasses were used to determine the effects of electrical stimulation (ES), hot-boning (HB), and mixing vs tumbling on the physical and chemical properties of restructured beef logs. Proximate analysis data showed HB to increase water-holding capacity and ash content over cold-boning (CB). Electrical stimulation increased peak force (PF) values over nonstimulation (NS), but there was no difference in the distance to peak force (DPF) values or energy values, indicating a slight improvement in binding ability with ES. Electrical simulation and HB increased binding ability of the meat proteins. Results of this study suggest that tumbling should be used with HB and mixing should be used with CB to reduce moisture losses.
“…In view of this truly remarkable array of near-panacean abilities, it is not really surprising that tenderization per se is not the principal inducement for stimulator use in U.S. meat plants (Terrell et al 1982). In most countries, less emphasis is placed on the cosmetic features of marbling and color (and, perhaps, correspondingly more on direct consumer reaction) than in the United States, and tenderness is the primary-and often the only-reason to apply the ES process.…”
Section: Meat Quality and Carcass Stimulationmentioning
All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means-graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systemswithout written permission of the publisher.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.