The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb07693.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing Properties of Beef Semimembranosus Muscle as Affected by Electrical Stimulation and Postmortem Treatment

Abstract: Semlmembranosus muscles from paired sides-electrically stimulated (ES) and not-stimulated (NES)-of mature cows were used to determine effects of certain postmortem treatments (state of rigor/temnerature) and of ES on nrocessinz uronerties. ES decreased (PO.O5) values for total protein or juice loss during cooking. State of rigor/temperature treatment affected pH and salt-soluble protein (SSP) values more than did… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is generally little problem with tenderness in a restructured product, so most of the increases in Kramer shear values have been attributed to increased binding ability of the meat proteins. These results , 1982a;Choi et al, 1984). When comparing mixing vs tumbling, or CB vs HB, no (P>O.OS) influence on the binding ability of the meat proteins was found.…”
Section: Instron@ Analysismentioning
confidence: 71%
“…There is generally little problem with tenderness in a restructured product, so most of the increases in Kramer shear values have been attributed to increased binding ability of the meat proteins. These results , 1982a;Choi et al, 1984). When comparing mixing vs tumbling, or CB vs HB, no (P>O.OS) influence on the binding ability of the meat proteins was found.…”
Section: Instron@ Analysismentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In view of this truly remarkable array of near-panacean abilities, it is not really surprising that tenderization per se is not the principal inducement for stimulator use in U.S. meat plants (Terrell et al 1982). In most countries, less emphasis is placed on the cosmetic features of marbling and color (and, perhaps, correspondingly more on direct consumer reaction) than in the United States, and tenderness is the primary-and often the only-reason to apply the ES process.…”
Section: Meat Quality and Carcass Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%