2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2003.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing optimization and functional properties of gelatin from shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) cartilage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
117
9
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
117
9
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Foam formation ability, foam stability, water-holding and fat-binding capacities Form formation ability (FA), foam stability (FS), Water-holding capacity (WHC) and fatbinding capacity (FBC) of the gelatins were determined based on the methods described by Cho et al (2004). One gram of gelatin was placed in 50 ml distilled water and swollen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foam formation ability, foam stability, water-holding and fat-binding capacities Form formation ability (FA), foam stability (FS), Water-holding capacity (WHC) and fatbinding capacity (FBC) of the gelatins were determined based on the methods described by Cho et al (2004). One gram of gelatin was placed in 50 ml distilled water and swollen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, bighead carp scales can be potentially used as a good gelatin source. Melting point is governed by complicated interactions determined by the amino acid composition and the ratio of α/β-chains, as well as molecular weight of the gelatin (Cho et al 2004). As it was shown in Table 1, gelatin usually exhibited lower melting points when extracted by UB and longer time.…”
Section: Melting Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicted values of yield, g-f, viscosity, and lightness were 10.2 (%), 526 (g), 5.85 (cP), and 70.0, respectively. Cho et al (2004a) optimized the gelatin processing from shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) cartilage by RSM: Predicted maximum yields of 79.9% for gelatin processing were obtained under the conditions of alkali treatment with 1.6 N sodium hydroxide for 3.16 days and hot-water extraction at 65°C for 3.4 h. Cho et al (2004b) also optimized gelatin extraction from dorsal skin of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) fish by RSM. Predicted values of multiple response optimal conditions (alkali treatment with 1.9% sodium hydroxide for 2.9 days and hot-water extraction at 58.1°C for 4.7 h) were g-f=429.1 and gelatin content=89.7 (%).…”
Section: Conditions For Optimum Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Jewish and Muslim communities do not accept pork gelatin (Badii and Nazlin 2006), and beef gelatin is acceptable only if it has been processed according to their religious requirements, which will vary. On the other hand the major defect of fish gelatin is its fishy odor (Cho et al 2004b). These considerations have encouraged production of gelatin from poultry waste derived by mechanical deboning operations as a replacement for mammalian gelatins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%