Processing of visual negation

He, Dexian; Li, Jinhui; Zhang, Miao; Chen, Yajue; He, Xianyou

doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2018.01249

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, social identity complexity is a method and strategy based on psychology, which has low dependence on administrative power and does not restrict people’s freedom of choice. The increased governance costs are also limited, which makes the strategy of using social identity complexity more advantageous [ 35 ]. It can provide effective reference for optimizing the third-party fairness maintenance mechanism.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Social Identity Complexity in Unfair Events on Intergroup Bias in Third-Party Fairness Maintenance

2023

Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The intergroup bias in third-party fairness maintenance includes two components: ingroup love and outgroup hate. Previous studies revealed that intergroup bias could be alleviated by high social identity complexity. This study explored the influence of the social identity complexity of parties in unfair events on intergroup bias in third-party fairness maintenance. Participants were divided into two groups and asked to choose from retention and punishment (Experiment One)/compensation (Experiment Two) to respond to unfair events presented by dictator games. To separate the components, we introduced additional unaffiliated members. Social identity complexity included single identity, presented as ingroup vs. outgroup sides of unfair events, and multiple identities, which included group identity and five additional identities. The results demonstrated that third parties tended to impose less punishment and more compensation on outgroup members under multiple than single identity conditions; however, the punishment and compensation to ingroup members exhibited no significant difference between the identity conditions. These results indicated that the multiple identities of the two sides in unfair events can reduce intergroup bias in third-party fairness maintenance, which can be achieved by reducing the outgroup hate rather than ingroup love.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Social Identity Complexity in Unfair Events on Intergroup Bias in Third-Party Fairness Maintenance

2023

Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Goal framing is a type of framing effect, also known as gain-loss framing, that presents information in a way that influences decision-making processes and encourages goal-oriented behavior [4,5]. Goal framing is widely applied in real-life decision-making scenarios, including health, economic, and political decisions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Leader’s Goal Framing on Followership Behavior: The Role of Work Meaning and Power Dependence

Xia,

Shi,

Wang

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While there is growing interest in leader–follower relationships in the leadership literature, little is known about how a leader’s framing effect triggers employees’ proactive behaviors. This research aims to extend previous knowledge about the effects of leaders’ goal framing and uncover their potential impacts on followership behaviors. Drawing on social information processing theory, this study proposes that both types of goal framing (gaining and losing) indirectly influence employees’ followership behaviors by mobilizing their sense of work meaning, especially when they have a power dependence on their leaders, using the method of questionnaire measurement, CFA analysis, hierarchical regression analysis, and the bootstrap tested hypotheses. The results show that gain framing indirectly contributes to employees’ followership behaviors by enhancing work meaning. Furthermore, this positive indirect relationship is stronger for employees with high power dependence. Yet another finding reveals that loss framing negatively impacts followership behavior by reducing employees’ sense of work meaning, which is unaffected by power dependence. From the perspective of the framing effect, this study verifies the influence of goal framing on employees’ behaviors and illustrates the effect of work meaning as a mechanism of goal framing on followership behavior.

show abstract

“…Appropriate behavioral decisions will guide the results of individual decisions and the choice of national development paths in the right direction, whereas inappropriate behavioral decisions will hinder the development of individuals and nations. Over the past 20 years, several Nobel Prize winners have worked on behavioral decision‐making, helping governments and actors at all levels to formulate public policies and solve social problems [ 3 ]. Behavioral decisions are subject to multiple factors, including environmental, economic, and psychological factors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality theory: New factors to incorporate in public decision‐making in communities

Yan

Zhang

et al. 2023

Health Care Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study explored the effects of personality factors on public behavioral decision-making. Methods:We examined the literature on personality theory based on triadic interaction decision theory, and summarized and compared the findings with studies of the Big Five personality characteristics. A literature review method was used to explore the implications of personality theory for public decisionmaking in Chinese communities.Results: Individuals with high neuroticism can be targeted by influential communicators. Individuals with high extraversion can influence decisionmaking through interpersonal relationships. Individuals with high levels of openness can be influenced by the development of novel activities. Conscientious individuals respond to scientific and rational knowledge. Individuals with high agreeableness can be influenced by groups. Conclusions: Personality traits can influence behavioral decisions and can have positive or negative effects on behavioral outcomes. For people with different personality traits, social actors and social activity communicators should formulate targeted measures according to the classification of personality traits. The current findings have implications for enriching research perspectives and approaches to public community decision-making.

show abstract

Processing of visual negation

Cited by 5 publications

References 8 publications

Impact of Social Identity Complexity in Unfair Events on Intergroup Bias in Third-Party Fairness Maintenance

Impact of Social Identity Complexity in Unfair Events on Intergroup Bias in Third-Party Fairness Maintenance

Impact of Leader’s Goal Framing on Followership Behavior: The Role of Work Meaning and Power Dependence

Personality theory: New factors to incorporate in public decision‐making in communities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About