1988
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03238.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of unstable bacteriophage T4 gene 32 mRNAs into a stable species requires Escherichia coli ribonuclease E.

Abstract: Gene 32 from bacteriophage T4 is transcribed as precursor transcripts which are processed to a stable product. This processing of the gene 32 mRNA was observed in RNase III or P‐deficient strains of Escherichia coli. However, after infection of an RNase E‐deficient strain, the amount of processed transcript was significantly reduced while the levels of the precursor transcripts remained high. RNase E therefore appears to have an essential role in the processing of the gene 32 mRNA. We have mapped the exact 5′ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6). Presence of such a stemloop-like structure downstream of the cleavage site has been reported to be required for the cleavage by RNase E. 25) Thus, it is possible that TS-2 may be attributable to a post-transcriptional cleavage of TS-1.…”
Section: Analysis Of 5?-terminal Region Of the A Vinelandii Icd Mrnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). Presence of such a stemloop-like structure downstream of the cleavage site has been reported to be required for the cleavage by RNase E. 25) Thus, it is possible that TS-2 may be attributable to a post-transcriptional cleavage of TS-1.…”
Section: Analysis Of 5?-terminal Region Of the A Vinelandii Icd Mrnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enzyme is involved in the processing of mRNA from bacteriophage T4 genes 32 and 59 in vivo. Processing of these messages resulted in destabilization of the portion of the mRNA upstream of the cleavage site (Mudd et al 1988;Carpousis et al 1989) and thus may have a role in retroregulation (Schmeissner et al 1984) of upstream gene expression. A comparison of the cleavage sites found in the noncoding RNAs and the T4 mRNAs revealed similarities in sequence at the cleavage sites and in the potential to form RNA secondary structure just downstream of the sites (Tomcs~inyi and Apirion 1985;Mudd et al 1988;Carpousis et al 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, RNase E must have a very stringent enzyme specificity, since it cleaves (i) 9S RNA (but not many other RNAs) and does so only at two specific sites (43), (ii) the small RNA 1 at one site (51), (iii) specific sites in some phage RNAs (28,36), and (iv) a specific site on the ribosomal protein S20 message (30). However, most RNA substrates tested were not degraded (34), and the substrate specificity so far appears to include a 9-nt sequence and, possibly, secondary structure (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rne and ams genes are probably the same (4, 13,35,49). An ams mutant shows slower mass decay of mRNA but normal functional decay rates (39,40), and the normal endonucleolytic cleavages are still observed (3,36). The primary function of RNase E, and how it affects mRNA mass decay, may be difficult to identify.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%