2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab176d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of prompt gamma-ray timing data for proton range measurements at a clinical beam delivery

Abstract: In proton therapy, patients benefit from the precise deposition of the dose in the tumor volume due to the interaction of charged particles with matter. Currently, the determination of the beam range in the patient’s body during the treatment is not a clinical standard. This lack causes broad safety margins around the tumor, which limits the potential of proton therapy. To overcome this obstacle, different methods are under investigation aiming at the verification of the proton range in real time during the ir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the strategy used for the PGPI technique and in the development of PGT at Oncoray. However, in the latter case, this bunch length is the main limitation of the accuracy of PGT [20,21] at clinical beam intensities. The reduction of the ToF resolution down to 100 ps rms would translate to a PG vertex position determination of 1-2 cm rms resolution (observation at 90 • ), proportional to the proton velocity: indeed, 1 cm rms holds for β = v/c = 0.3, i.e., 3 cm from the end of the proton range.…”
Section: √ N Pgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is the strategy used for the PGPI technique and in the development of PGT at Oncoray. However, in the latter case, this bunch length is the main limitation of the accuracy of PGT [20,21] at clinical beam intensities. The reduction of the ToF resolution down to 100 ps rms would translate to a PG vertex position determination of 1-2 cm rms resolution (observation at 90 • ), proportional to the proton velocity: indeed, 1 cm rms holds for β = v/c = 0.3, i.e., 3 cm from the end of the proton range.…”
Section: √ N Pgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They estimated the achievable probability with 95% confidence level to detect a 3mm thickness variation of an air cavity in a PMMA phantom with 10 8 incident protons and a single detector having a detection efficiency of 1.5 × 10 −3 . In order to illustrate the asset of such 100 ps time-resolution in single proton counting mode, Figure 1 compares the results derived from PGT with 162 MeV proton beams at clinical intensities (in bunch-counting mode with >10 2 protons/bunch, where the ToF is measured between a detected PG relative to the accelerator HF signal) from Werner et al [21] and those obtained in Marcatili et al [24] with 68 MeV protons in single incident particle regime (i.e., the ToF is measured relative to the arrival of the single proton that induced the PG). In the first case, a 2-cm air cavity is inserted in a PMMA phantom at 9 cm depth.…”
Section: Prompt Gamma Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of LaBr 3 as scintillation material is motivated by its excellent energy resolution and short decay time of 16 ns. The first trait is convenient for the compensation of gain fluctations in the Photomultiplier Tube (PMT) as a function of count rate [75]. The second is extremely important in order to minimize the pile-up probability.…”
Section: E Detector Count Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latests results from the prompt gamma ray timing experiments (Werner et al, 2019) show that the device has been tested at short irradiation times of 70 ms and clinical beam currents of 2 nA. However, the method is sensitive to the unstable relation between the phase of the accelerator RF and the delivery of the proton bunches.…”
Section: Overview Of the Current State Of Pet And Prompt Gamma Detectmentioning
confidence: 99%