Reinforced Polymer Composites 2019
DOI: 10.1002/9783527820979.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of Polymer‐Based Nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, it increases again mainly because of degradation of continuous phase which give rise to penetration of moisture through the microcracks generated due to the presence of voids. Almost similar trends were observed by Nayak et al in their work. It is further observed that for neat epoxy, saturation in water absorption occurs around 72 hours whereas for its composites, it saturation attains at 144 hours for Set A composites whereas for Set B composites, saturation occurs much earlier that is, at around 120 hours.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Later, it increases again mainly because of degradation of continuous phase which give rise to penetration of moisture through the microcracks generated due to the presence of voids. Almost similar trends were observed by Nayak et al in their work. It is further observed that for neat epoxy, saturation in water absorption occurs around 72 hours whereas for its composites, it saturation attains at 144 hours for Set A composites whereas for Set B composites, saturation occurs much earlier that is, at around 120 hours.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The increase in flexural strength is due to the reason that TiO 2 particles with smaller size have stronger interfacial interaction between the matrix and TiO 2 . However, when the size of TiO 2 is 60 nm, the agglomerates reduce the active surface area to interact with polymeric matrix and fibres . It will reduce the load transfer efficiency at the matrix‐fibre interface, thereby decreasing the flexural strength of the laminate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar kind of the behavior was observed in glass fiber-epoxy composite reinforced with nano-TiO2. [30] In the Figure 9, though, ILSS for composites with nanofillers of 0.4, 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 wt% is almost same but strain developed is more for the composite with 0.6 wt% nanofillers which is almost 40% more than the other three. Indicates composite with 0.6 wt% nanofillers establishes better bonding between the matrix elements which allow it to undergo more elongation without failure.…”
Section: Inter-laminar Shear Strengthmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The results obtained shows good agreement with literature. [29,30,46] Addition of F I G U R E 1 6 Scanning electron microscopy images of the worn surface of the composite filled with A, 0 wt%; B, 0.2 wt%; C, 0.4 wt%; D, 0.6 wt%; E, 1.2 wt%; F, 1.8 wt%; G, 2.4 wt%; H, 3 wt% nanofillers. Note: A, smooth fiber surface; F, fiber breakage; G, interfacial debonding; H, nanoparticles; I, agglomeration; K, pits; M, fiber imprints; N, debris; O, voids; P, micro cracks; Q, wear scars [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] small amount of fillers to the matrix help to fabricate the composites with uniform thickness and improves processability, as the fillers are stiffer compare to matrix.…”
Section: Flexural Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%