2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of particle stabilized Al2TiO5–ZrTiO4 foam to porous ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy of attachment or free energy gained (G) by the adsorption of a particle at the interface can be calculated by Equation 2, where γ represents gas-liquid interfacial energy, θ is contact angle, and r is particle size. 23,24 From Equation 2, larger particles bring greater attachment energy. The length of the mullite whiskers used in this paper was about 60 μm which was much larger than other particles.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy of attachment or free energy gained (G) by the adsorption of a particle at the interface can be calculated by Equation 2, where γ represents gas-liquid interfacial energy, θ is contact angle, and r is particle size. 23,24 From Equation 2, larger particles bring greater attachment energy. The length of the mullite whiskers used in this paper was about 60 μm which was much larger than other particles.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This moderately high energy, which is associated with irreversible adsorption of the particles at the air-water interface, leads to the outstanding stability (within the range of 70% to 83%) that is exhibited by the particle-stabilized wet foams. In the case of the surfactant-stabilized wet foam, the adsorption free energy values of the surfactant molecules range within a few joules, thereby limiting the foam stability; 2,8,15,18) moreover, the wet-foam stability of the ceramic foam is > 83%, and this proves that the addition of PMMA beads at levels up to 20 wt% moderately increases the stability of the wet foams. Figure 5 shows the air content of the suspension and the porosity of the sintered sample as a function of the bead content.…”
Section: Direct Foaming Drying Sintering and Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1(a), respectively. 20,68,69) In this review, the direct foaming technique is taken as the main processing technique, which can be used for the fabrication of porous ceramics with tailored microstructure, where pores are introduced into the colloidal suspension by the mechanical frothing process of the general mixture. These simple yet versatile approaches give rise to porous ceramics with unique microstructural features that control the properties and functions of the ceramic materials.…”
Section: Processing Routes To Porous Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, each fabrication method was best suited for producing a specific range of cell sizes, cell size distribution, and the overall amount of porosity, as well as for influencing the level of interconnectivity among the cells, amount, thickness, and orientation of the cell walls. 4,11,20,[90][91][92][93][94] In this review, the direct foaming technique relies on the use of surfactants or particles to stabilize a foam generated by mechanical frothing or bubbling of a gas through a suspension. Direct foaming produces porous materials by the incorporation of air into a suspension or liquid medium.…”
Section: Direct Foaming Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation