2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of implicit versus explicit predictive contextual information in Parkinson's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant P3a effect was observed between cue types in the explicit condition (t (13) ϭ 0.084, p ϭ 0.934, BF 10 ϭ 0.271). These results seem to corroborate previous findings demonstrating the influence of contextual processes on the P3, where P3 activity is modulated when the model or context of a stimulus environment needs to be updated (Donchin, 1981;Donchin and Coles, 1988;Polich and Kok, 1995;Todorovic et al, 2011;Seppänen et al, 2012;Silverstein et al, 2015;Bang and Rahnev, 2017;Li et al, 2018).…”
Section: Eeg Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…No significant P3a effect was observed between cue types in the explicit condition (t (13) ϭ 0.084, p ϭ 0.934, BF 10 ϭ 0.271). These results seem to corroborate previous findings demonstrating the influence of contextual processes on the P3, where P3 activity is modulated when the model or context of a stimulus environment needs to be updated (Donchin, 1981;Donchin and Coles, 1988;Polich and Kok, 1995;Todorovic et al, 2011;Seppänen et al, 2012;Silverstein et al, 2015;Bang and Rahnev, 2017;Li et al, 2018).…”
Section: Eeg Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The VTA provides essentially normal levels of dopamine to the ventral striatum (VS), composed of the nucleus accumbens ventral caudate and putamen, as well as to the limbic (e.g., hippocampus) and prefrontal cortices. According to the dopamine overdose hypothesis, dopaminergic therapy, titrated to motor symptoms and hence DS dopamine deficiency, distributes in a non-targeted fashion, presumably overdosing VTA-innervated brain regions and worsening functions performed by these brain regions (Cools, 2006;Gotham et al, 1984;Kish et al, 1988;Macdonald and Monchi, 2011) The dopaminergic system has been implicated in processing regularities in sounds through its downstream projections, including areas of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus D'Ardenne et al, 2012;Li et al, 2018). Extrapolations from these studies notwithstanding, the effect of aging, PD, and dopaminergic medication on the fundamental process of regularity detection in sound is not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was because high cluster coefficients and long path lengths are correlated with increased functional connections within the frontal loops, indicating less neurons/networks to support communications between the frontal and other cortical regions. Li 90 2018 OAP [58.1 (2.5)]; n = 17 OA [57 (2.6)]; n = 15 EEG Predictive sequence visual task OAP patients showed similar P3b amplitude across the implicit and explicit trials (when they were made aware of the predictive sequence and the subsequent target), whereas OA had higher P3b amplitudes for the explicit condition. OAP also exhibited longer P3b latencies for predicted targets compared to random targets in both the implicit and explicit sessions, indicating slower processing speed of predicted targets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies repeatedly showed that PD patients were able to detect targets but unable to utilize the contextual information (ie, a predictive sequence to help them generate a faster response in a subsequent trial). 25 , 89 , 90 Based on the authors’ interpretation, the extensive connections in PD patients’ frontal networks inhibited the rate at which information was relayed, hence the underperformance on the processing of contexts in this population. 89 , 90 Fogelson et al also compared CP performance involving PD and schizophrenic patients, and reported that both patient groups had abnormal network changes when processing context-dependent stimuli, specifically weaker frontal-temporal-parietal connections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation