2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of food pictures: Influence of hunger, gender and calorie content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
196
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
19
196
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has relevance considering the potential consumer benefits of satiety enhancing foods (Hetherington et al, 2013). Furthermore, research might examine food perceptions under different environmental and physiological conditions, such as how packaging or branding (Cavanagh et al 2014), portion size (Piqueras-Fiszman, Harrar, Alcaide, & Spence, 2011) or nutritional status (Cabanac, 1979;Frank et al 2010) affects food perceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has relevance considering the potential consumer benefits of satiety enhancing foods (Hetherington et al, 2013). Furthermore, research might examine food perceptions under different environmental and physiological conditions, such as how packaging or branding (Cavanagh et al 2014), portion size (Piqueras-Fiszman, Harrar, Alcaide, & Spence, 2011) or nutritional status (Cabanac, 1979;Frank et al 2010) affects food perceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malefemale sex differences in brain activation in response to the flavors of normal foods (176,675), to pure tastes (299), and to pictures of food (135,231,264,378,748) have been reported. In a recent review of this literature, Geliebter et al (264) concluded that if brain areas are classed by their predominate functions, as described above, pictures of food stimuli elicit more activation in areas related to planning and executing behaviors in men and more activation in areas related to cognitive and affective processes in women.…”
Section: R1243 Sex Differences In the Physiology Of Eatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, such an association between brain responses to visual food cues and BMI was essentially absent for men, suggesting that body mass among men is likely to be more affected by any of a number of other factors that were not examined in the current study. The present findings build upon prior work showing that women tend to show greater corticolimbic responses to visual images of high-calorie food compared with men, 16,64 and further suggest that long-term body weight status in women may be associated with greater responsiveness of the food motivation network to visual images depicting highly palatable food. Although further research will be necessary to determine the extent to which these findings may relate to actual food consumption and weight gain, these preliminary findings may have important implications regarding the higher rates of obesity 2,4 and eating disorders 5-7 among women.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%