2003
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.254-256.833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of Ca-P Ceramics, Surface Characteristics and Biological Performance

Abstract: Surface pollution by Mg and carbon has been identified by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) analysis on monophasic (100% stoichiometric hydroxyapatite) or biphasic (70% hydroxyapatite, 30% b-tricalcium phosphate) ceramics obtained by sintering of Ca-P powder of standard purity. Magnesium was the main impurity, although it is present only as traces in synthesised Ca-P powders, it concentrates on the surface of the ceramic during the sintering process due to its poor solubility in HA. Carbon pollution is co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray porosity with a bimodal distribution (macro-and microporosity) [13,14]. High porosity and presence of interconnections help new bone formation, osteoprogenitor cells distribution and neoangiogenesis [15], otherwise osteoconduction decreases when magnesium and carbonic impurities are present inside bioceramic scaffolds [16]. On the other hand, low scaffold density causes a reduction of bone substitute mechanical strength and an increase of graft fracture risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…X-ray porosity with a bimodal distribution (macro-and microporosity) [13,14]. High porosity and presence of interconnections help new bone formation, osteoprogenitor cells distribution and neoangiogenesis [15], otherwise osteoconduction decreases when magnesium and carbonic impurities are present inside bioceramic scaffolds [16]. On the other hand, low scaffold density causes a reduction of bone substitute mechanical strength and an increase of graft fracture risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%