2018
DOI: 10.1101/290106
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of Auditory Novelty Across the Cortical Hierarchy: An Intracranial Electrophysiology Study

Abstract: Under the predictive coding hypothesis, specific spatiotemporal patterns of cortical activation are postulated to occur during sensory processing as expectations generate feedback predictions and prediction errors generate feedforward signals. Establishing experimental evidence for this information flow within cortical hierarchy has been difficult, especially in humans, due to spatial and temporal limitations of non-invasive measures of cortical activity. This study investigated cortical responses to auditory … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, evidence suggests that clinical evaluation alone is insufficient to fully evaluate patients with disorders of consciousness (Bayne et al, 2017; Bernat, 2017; Naccache, 2017; Schnakers et al, 2009). The present study also serves as a foundation for ongoing and future studies that seek to gain better understanding of sensitivity of auditory cortical novelty processing to general anesthesia (Nourski et al, 2018). In turn, knowledge gained from this work will contribute to improvements in accuracy of assessing conscious processing in clinical and non-clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, evidence suggests that clinical evaluation alone is insufficient to fully evaluate patients with disorders of consciousness (Bayne et al, 2017; Bernat, 2017; Naccache, 2017; Schnakers et al, 2009). The present study also serves as a foundation for ongoing and future studies that seek to gain better understanding of sensitivity of auditory cortical novelty processing to general anesthesia (Nourski et al, 2018). In turn, knowledge gained from this work will contribute to improvements in accuracy of assessing conscious processing in clinical and non-clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The data presented here were collected within the context of a larger study on effects of general anesthesia on auditory cortical responses during a pre-drug baseline period (Nourski et al, 2018). As part of that study, the subjects’ overall level of alertness was evaluated over the course of the experiment using the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale, which ranges from OAA/S = 5 for fully awake to OAA/S = 1 for unresponsive even to noxious stimuli (Chernik et al, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no specific instructions were given about keeping eyes open or closed, subjects were observed to have eyes closed during nearly all resting state recordings. Data were recorded in 6-minute blocks, interleaved with an auditory stimulus paradigm as part of a separate study (Nourski et al, 2018a, b). Data were collected during an awake baseline period and during induction of general anesthesia with incrementally titrated propofol infusion (50 – 150 μg/kg/min; Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melodic expectations modulate auditory responses in higher cortical areas. Since melodic expectations reflect regularities within a musical tone sequence at multiple time-scales that depend on the extent of knowledge and exposure of the subject listening to them, we hypothesized that neural signals correlated with the melodic properties of the music would be generated at higher hierarchical cortical levels than those strictly due to the acoustics (Sammler et al 2013;Bianco et al 2016;Nourski et al 2018). EEG lacks the spatial resolution needed to test this hypothesis, but the test was possible in spatially localized ECoG recordings from three patients who had electrodes over the early primary auditory areas in the anterior transverse temporal gyrus, also called Heschl Gyrus (HG; patients 1 and 3), the belt regions along planum temporale (PT) and the superior temporal gyrus (STG), as well as the supra-marginal gyrus (SMG) in the parietal lobe (see Tables S1-S3 for details on the channel locations).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%