Processing negative autobiographical memories in a foreign language

Abstract

The use of a foreign language has been introduced in the clinical setting as a form of emotional distance to help deal with negative experiences. However, its evidence of reducing emotionality during the emotional processing is still scarce. This study aims to test whether the description and processing of a traumatic or highly emotional event in a foreign language could modulate the strength of the connection between traumatic symptomatology and emotional reaction. For this purpose, a sample of 128 healthy participants completed a series of questionnaires via an online platform. Firstly, their levels of distress, arousal and valence were assessed in their native language. Secondly, they were assigned to either the native language or the foreign language group and described a negative childhood event in the assigned language, followed by five questions adapted from Foa and Rothbaum (1998) and related to the event. Next, their emotionality was assessed again in their native language. Finally, a questionnaire of traumatic stress symptoms and an avoidance scale were completed. Multivariate regression analyses showed that the relationship between traumatic symptomatology and emotionality was moderated by the language of processing the negative event. Traumatic symptomatology was more strongly associated with distress and arousal change when the task was performed in the native language. These findings suggest the influence of a foreign language on emotional reactivity when a negative experience is processed, which could be an essential tool in the treatment of disorders related to stress and trauma.

‘My recovery is in English’: Clients' language choices in multilingual psychotherapy

“…Ortigosa‐Beltrán et al. (2023), for instance, investigated the relationship between post‐traumatic symptoms and emotional reactivity among 115 participants who spoke Spanish as their L1 and had a high level of English LX proficiency. All of the participants had a traumatic or a highly negative childhood event that they had to describe and then rate the levels of painfulness and interference on a scale from 0 to 10.…”