2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-43-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing and performance of topobathymetric lidar data for geomorphometric and morphological classification in a high-energy tidal environment

Abstract: Abstract. The transition zone between land and water is difficult to map with conventional geophysical systems due to shallow water depth and often challenging environmental conditions. The emerging technology of airborne topobathymetric light detection and ranging (lidar) is capable of providing both topographic and bathymetric elevation information, using only a single green laser, resulting in a seamless coverage of the land-water transition zone. However, there is no transparent and reproducible method for… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas conventional methods for mapping bathymetry can provide accurate measurements, they can have limitations due to restricted accessibility, safety precautions and time required [13,14] to fully cover the interested areas. In the other hand, ALB data requires post-processing, including filtering and removal noise and false echoes, water surface detection and correction for the refraction [15]. ALB surveys are affected by environmental conditions such as floods, rain and snow and by water turbidity, since dissolved and suspended organic material affect negatively the river bottom reflection [16].…”
Section: Of 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas conventional methods for mapping bathymetry can provide accurate measurements, they can have limitations due to restricted accessibility, safety precautions and time required [13,14] to fully cover the interested areas. In the other hand, ALB data requires post-processing, including filtering and removal noise and false echoes, water surface detection and correction for the refraction [15]. ALB surveys are affected by environmental conditions such as floods, rain and snow and by water turbidity, since dissolved and suspended organic material affect negatively the river bottom reflection [16].…”
Section: Of 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ground points were already filtered by AHM who removed the raw data noise originated from the laser being scattered by birds, clouds, dust and other particles. The filtering process involved both automatic and manual filtering (see [15] for more details). In addition, vegetation was also removed from the point cloud by AHM in the pre-processing step.…”
Section: Terrain Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the spatial resolution and accuracy of data obtainable by these methods is lower than that possible using MBES. Another alternative, is bathymetric Lidar (Andersen et al, 2017;Eisemann et al, 2018), this is can provide higher resolution data than satellite or X-band radar, yet is limited by meteorological and ocean conditions. The use of remote sensing data offers significant accuracy improvements over the more manual and traditional methods required to analyse historic analogue datasets, which also rely on the skills of an individual, and can lead potentially to high levels of uncertainty (Burningham and French, 2011).…”
Section: Monitoring the Coast Beaches And Cliffsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the classification methodology of Weiss (2001), Wright et al (2005) developed a geomorphometric classification tool, that is the Benthic Terrain Modeler (BTM) for classifying benthic terrain using bathymetry data. Several classification schemes using the BTM have since been established (e.g., Andersen et al, 2017; Diesing et al, 2009; Lundblad et al, 2006; Verfaillie et al, 2007). Such classifications use threshold‐values of surface derivatives to convey interpretation of morphometric classes (Drăguţ & Eisank, 2011), that is land‐surface segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%