2019
DOI: 10.14786/flr.v7i3.451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing and learning from multiple sources: A comparative case study of students with dyslexia working in a multiple source multimedia context

Abstract: This study investigated how four 10th-grade students with dyslexia processed and integrated information across web pages and representations when learning in a multiple source multimedia context. Eye movement data showed that participants' processing of the materials varied with respect to their initial exploration of the web pages, their overall processing time, and the linearity of their processing patterns, with post-learning interviews indicating the deliberate, strategic considerations underlying each par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, for practical reasons, we had a limited amount of time to test students in schools, and thus, we were not able to examine to what extent other cognitive skills, such as working memory capacity, play a role in the ORC performance of students with reading difficulties and/or difficulties in attention and EF (cf. Andresen et al, 2019a;Andresen et al, 2019b). In addition, we did not include any process data, such as verbal protocols and response times, to access the students' online strategies.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, for practical reasons, we had a limited amount of time to test students in schools, and thus, we were not able to examine to what extent other cognitive skills, such as working memory capacity, play a role in the ORC performance of students with reading difficulties and/or difficulties in attention and EF (cf. Andresen et al, 2019a;Andresen et al, 2019b). In addition, we did not include any process data, such as verbal protocols and response times, to access the students' online strategies.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whether to trust a report in social media) (Kiili et al, 2018b;Leu, Kinzer, Coiro, Castek, & Henry, 2013;Rouet, 2006;Salmerón, Strømsø, Kammerer, Stadtler, & van den Broek, 2018). Literacy research has focused on understanding how students use textual, and to some extent pictorial, information, but there is still a lack of research on how students use, integrate, and evaluate information from videos for educational purposes (Ainsworth, 2018;Andresen, Anmarkrud, Salmerón & Bråten, 2019;List, 2018;List & Ballenger, 2019;Smith, Kiili, & Kauppinen, 2016). This situation contrasts with the high consumption rate of Internet videos by teenagers, both for leisure and for informational purposes (Eurostat, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After all, it is a relatively easy alternative for teachers and students to find good and varied reading material because it can be taken from various sources around it. Teachers and students don't need to "hassle" looking for books that are relatively more expensive than looking from other sources (Andresen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%