2008
DOI: 10.1037/a0013310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processes involved in client-nominated relationship building incidents: Client attachment, attachment to therapist, and session impact.

Abstract: Thirty volunteer clients of trainee therapists nominated an incident that was critical in the development of their therapeutic relationship. Clients completed the Client Attachment to Therapist Scale (CATS), the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECRS), and the Session Impacts Scale (SIS). Clients reported an increase in attachment security with their therapists, along with perceptions of support and relief and increasing exploration following the relationship building incident. While clients' avoidant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter subscale is similar to the construct of attachment anxiety, whilst the Avoidant-Fearful subscale measures aspects of attachment avoidance and anxiety. Studies using the CATS suggest that secure attachment towards the therapist is associated with better WA, whereas avoidant-fearful attachment is associated with poor WA (Fuertes et al, 2007;Janzen, Fitzpatrick, & Drapeau, 2008;Mallinckrodt et al, 2005;Romano, Fitzpatrick, & Janzen, 2008;Sauer, Anderson, Gormley, Richardson, & Preacco, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter subscale is similar to the construct of attachment anxiety, whilst the Avoidant-Fearful subscale measures aspects of attachment avoidance and anxiety. Studies using the CATS suggest that secure attachment towards the therapist is associated with better WA, whereas avoidant-fearful attachment is associated with poor WA (Fuertes et al, 2007;Janzen, Fitzpatrick, & Drapeau, 2008;Mallinckrodt et al, 2005;Romano, Fitzpatrick, & Janzen, 2008;Sauer, Anderson, Gormley, Richardson, & Preacco, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, internal consistency α coefficients were .82 for avoidance and .93 for anxiety. Because it may be useful to refer to benchmarks scores for dimensions of attachment for clients in previous research, we note that previous research with non-clinical samples of non-help-seeking, volunteer clients has found mean ECR scores on attachment anxiety ranging from M = 3.45 ( SD = 1.07) to M = 3.59 ( SD = 1.08) and on avoidance ranging from M = 2.53 ( SD = 1.19) to M = 2.62 ( SD = 1.18; Janzen, Fitzpatrick, & Drapeau, 2008; Romano, Fitzpatrick, & Janzen, 2008). Other research with clinical samples (i.e., treatment-seeking clients) has found mean ECR scores on attachment anxiety ranging from M = 4.13 ( SD = 1.07) to M = 4.35 ( SD = 1.24) and on avoidance ranging from M = 3.19 ( SD = 1.14) to M = 3.29 ( SD = 1.37; Mallinckrodt, Porter, & Kivlighan, 2005; Moore & Gelso, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, Mallinckrodt, Porter, and Kivlighan (2005) found that secure attachment to therapist, as measured with the Secure subscale of the CATS, was related to patients' experience of depth, smoothness, and exploration in sessions. This finding has been replicated in two other studies using similar methodology (Janzen, Fitzpatrick, & Drapeau, 2008;Romano, Fitzpatrick, & Janzen, 2008). Also, in a study applying the CAQ-T, Saypol and Farber (2010) found that the quality of patient attachment to the therapist was associated with higher levels of patient self-disclosure in treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%