Processes, contexts, and rationale for disinvestment: a protocol for a critical interpretive synthesis

Abstract

BackgroundPractical solutions are needed to support the appropriate use of available health system resources as countries are continually pressured to ‘do more with less’ in health care. Increasingly, health systems and organizations are exploring the reassessment of possibly obsolete, inefficient, or ineffective health system resources and potentially redirecting funds to those that are more effective and efficient. Such processes are often referred to as ‘disinvestment’. Our objective is to gain further understanding about: 1) whether how and under what conditions health systems decide to pursue disinvestment; 2) how health systems have chosen to undertake disinvestment; and 3) how health systems have implemented their disinvestment approach.Methods/DesignWe will use a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) approach, to develop a theoretical framework based on insights drawn from a range of relevant sources. We will conduct systematic searches of databases as well as purposive searches to identify literature to fill conceptual gaps that may emerge during our inductive process of synthesis and analysis. Two independent reviewers will assess search results for relevance and conceptually map included references. We will include all empirical and non-empirical articles that focus on disinvestment at a system level. We will then extract key findings from a purposive sample of articles using frameworks related to government agendas, policy development and implementation, and health system contextual factors and then synthesize and integrate the findings to develop a framework about our core areas of interest. Lastly, we will convene a stakeholder dialogue with Canadian and international policymakers and other stakeholders to solicit targeted feedback about the framework (e.g., by identifying any gaps in the literature that we may want to revisit before finalizing it) and deliberating about barriers for developing and implementing approaches to disinvestment, strategies to address these barriers and about next steps that could be taken by different constituencies.DiscussionDisinvestment is an emerging field and there is a need for evidence to inform the prioritization, development, and implementation of strategies in different contexts. Our CIS and the framework developed through it will support the actions of those involved in the prioritization, development, and implementation of disinvestment initiatives.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42014013204Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-143) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Understanding the implementation of evidence-informed policies and practices from a policy perspective: a critical interpretive synthesis

“…Unlike traditional systematic reviews that often focus on questions of effectiveness, CIS is helpful in generating midrange theories with strong explanatory power. (20,21) This is suitable for our goal of developing a conceptual framework that better integrates ndings from diverse elds and affords the opportunity to critically inspect both individual studies and the literature from each eld as a whole in terms of the nature of the assumptions underlying each eld, and what has in uenced their proposed solution. (22) The method begins with a compass question, which evolves throughout the course of the review.…”

Policymakers and institutional structures affecting health inequality in Ethiopia: a Qualitative Study

“…The study was grounded in a combination of Social Determinants of Health (30), the '3-i theory' and the 'Policy Triangle Framework' (31). The '3-i' theory argues that effective policy setting, and implementation requires: 'idea'the appropriate knowledge; the right set-up and capable 'institute'; and 'interest' groups that promote a policy (32). The Policy Triangle Frameworks (PTF) recommends analysis of content, context and process in policy researching (33).…”

Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting

“…The first is broad and includes every element of healthcare delivery [ 22 , 61 , 85 , 86 ]. The second uses only a selection of these elements [ 12 , 42 , 87 – 90 ]. The third does not use a specific definition but suggests that health technologies are separate from other elements by including ‘health technologies’ within a list of selected items [ 27 , 45 , 49 , 51 , 53 , 91 – 93 ].…”

“…Disinvestment is frequently presented as if it is a new paradigm for health improvement. It has been described as an ‘emerging field’; disinvestment approaches, processes and initiatives are discussed; ‘research agendas’ are considered; and the need for mechanisms, frameworks, methods and tools are widely acknowledged [ 26 , 35 – 39 , 47 , 49 – 51 , 56 , 88 , 90 , 91 , 98 , 101 , 105 , 123 ]. However there are several health improvement paradigms with mature frameworks and validated methods and tools that are widely-used and well-accepted in local health services that already undertake disinvestment-type activities.…”