Processes and Consequences in Business Ethical Dilemmas: The Oil Industry and Climate Changes

Abstract

This paper proposes a framework to examine business ethical dilemmas and business attitudes towards such dilemmas. Business ethical dilemmas can be understood as reflecting a contradiction between a socially detrimental process and a self-interested profitable consequence. This representation allows us to distinguish two forms of behavior differing by whether priority is put on consequences or on processes. We argue that these forms imply very different business attitudes towards society: controversial or competitive for the former and aligned or cooperative for the latter. These attitudes are then analyzed at the discursive level in order to address the question of good faith in business argumentation, i.e. to which extent are these attitudes consistent with actual business behaviors. We argue that consequential attitudes mostly involve communication and lobbying actions aiming at eluding the dilemma. Therefore, the question of good faith for consequential attitudes lies in the consistency between beliefs and discourse. On the other hand, procedural attitudes acknowledge the dilemma and claim a change of the process of behavior. They thus raise the question of the consistency between discourses and actual behavior. We apply this processes / consequences framework to the case of the oil industry's climate change ethical dilemma which comes forth as a dilemma between 'emitting greenhouse gases' and 'making more profits'. And we examine the different attitudes of two oil corporations -BP Amoco and ExxonMobil -towards the dilemma.

The Advocate’s Own Challenges to Behave in a Sustainable Way: An Institutional Analysis of Advocacy NGOs

“…This forces NGOs to make trade-offs concerning resources like money and time. Following Le Menestrel and de Bettignies (2002), trade-offs between processes and consequences characterize business ethical dilemmas. The distinctive challenge for the researched NGOs is that in their case the dilemmas are not between economic interests (consequences) and ethical values of business actors (processes) (Le Menestrel and de Bettignies 2002); rather, it is between 'walking the talk' themselves (processes) and accomplishing their advocacy mission (consequences).…”

Rethinking environmental leadership: The social construction of leaders and leadership in discourses of ecological crisis, development, and conservation

“…leadership studies (see, inter alia, contributions to the special issues of Business and Society, 2012, Organization Studies, 2012, and Organization, 2013Banerjee, 2003;Böhm et al, 2012;Goodall, 2008;Le Menestrel et al, 2002;Levy and Egan, 2003;Marshall et al, 2011;Wittneben et al, 2012;Wright et al, 2013). However, to the best of our knowledge, scholars in this field have not, as yet, interrogated the ways in which leadership phenomena are approached and understood within the environmental science community.…”

Future Petroleum Geopolitics: Consequences of Climate Policy and Unconventional Oil and Gas

“…What little analysis exists of the consequences of climate change for the petroleum sector is mostly from the early 2000s, with a peak around 2002 Springer, 2002;Van den Hove, Le Menestrel, and de Bettignies, 2002;Le Menestrel, van den Hove, and de Bettignies, 2002;Skjaerseth and Skodvin, 2003;. Given the fast pace of change in the petroleum sector, in climate science and in climate politics, much of this literature is now outdated.…”