Processed Electroencephalogram-Based Monitoring to Guide Sedation in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Recommendations from an International Expert Panel-Based Consensus

Abstract

Background The use of processed electroencephalography (pEEG) for depth of sedation (DOS) monitoring is increasing in anesthesia; however, how to use of this type of monitoring for critical care adult patients within the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of international experts consisting of 21 clinicians involved in monitoring DOS in ICU patients was carefully selected on the basis of their expertise in neurocritical care and neuroanesthesiology. Panelists were assigned four domains (techniques for electroencephalography [EEG] monitoring, patient selection, use of the EEG monitors, competency, and training the principles of pEEG monitoring) from which a list of questions and statements was created to be addressed. A Delphi method based on iterative approach was used to produce the final statements. Statements were classified as highly appropriate or highly inappropriate (median rating ≥ 8), appropriate (median rating ≥ 7 but < 8), or uncertain (median rating < 7) and with a strong disagreement index (DI) (DI < 0.5) or weak DI (DI ≥ 0.5 but < 1) consensus. Results According to the statements evaluated by the panel, frontal pEEG (which includes a continuous colored density spectrogram) has been considered adequate to monitor the level of sedation (strong consensus), and it is recommended by the panel that all sedated patients (paralyzed or nonparalyzed) unfit for clinical evaluation would benefit from DOS monitoring (strong consensus) after a specific training program has been performed by the ICU staff. To cover the gap between knowledge/rational and routine application, some barriers must be broken, including lack of knowledge, validation for prolonged sedation, standardization between monitors based on different EEG analysis algorithms, and economic issues. Conclusions Evidence on using DOS monitors in ICU is still scarce, and further research is required to better define the benefits of using pEEG. This consensus highlights that some critically ill patients may benefit from this type of neuromonitoring.

Recovery From Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Is Associated With Increasing Alpha Power in the Frontal Electroencephalogram During Propofol Sedation: A Case Report

“…This represents a critical knowledge gap, limiting the routine use EEG-guided sedation in the ICU. 8 A large retrospective study that related comorbidity-dependent changes in EEG responses to anesthetics in the operating room found that a wide range of comorbidities was associated with decreased alpha power. 9 Our case supports this growing evidence base and helps translate it to ICU use with finer temporal resolution and a within-subject paradigm.…”

Electroencephalography spectral edge frequency and suppression rate-guided sedation in patients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial

“…In the ICU, the use of EEG-based monitors is controversial and the evidence is still scarce. However, recent consensus had recommended its use to monitor the level of sedation in all patients unsuitable for clinical evaluation (43). In neurocritical patients, a beneficial impact of BIS-guided sedation in addition to a clinical scale-guided protocol was reported (44).…”

State-of-the-Art Evaluation of Acute Adult Disorders of Consciousness for the General Intensivist

“…5). Some centers use processed electroencephalography devices to help guide sedation administration to avoid over- and under-sedation, especially with concomitant neuromuscular blockade (85). If the underlying cause is driven by DDI, both agents should be stopped, and a decision made as to whether either should be resumed or replaced.…”