ProcessAR: An augmented reality-based tool to create in-situ procedural 2D/3D AR Instructions

Chidambaram, Subramanian; Huang, Hank; He, Fengming; Qian, Xun; Villanueva, Ana; Redick, Thomas S.; Stuerzlinger, Wolfgang; Ramani, Karthik

doi:10.1145/3461778.3462126

Cited by 18 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Comparable sentiments were also present in other participants' comments (P1, 3,6,11). As with pARam, participants also criticized aspects like view controls (P8, 9,12,16,19) or discoverability (P10, 21).…”

Section: Desktop Rather Desktop Neutral Rather Param Parammentioning

confidence: 69%

“…Customizer interfaces are a way to create remixes [28], which was considered as a way to support creative practitioners in authoring immersive experiences through sampling [106]. Specific tools like SpatialProto [80], Pro-cessAR [21], ProtoAR [84], VRCeption [36], or VRFromX [47] are examples where XR is leveraged to provide an authoring environment for new, immersive environments and applications.…”

Section: Design In and For Extended Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a downside, participants mentioned the basic input handling, especially related to the sliders on the 2D interface: the "Pinching gesture was very hard to do correct" (P3), or "The use of the sliders was a bit difficult to get the exact value I wanted" (P14). Criticisms related to the HoloLens' inputs and MRTK's handling of them were also mentioned by most participants in some way (P1, [3][4][5][8][9][10][11][12]14,16,[18][19][20][21] and can be optimized through UI sizing, positioning, and sensitivity. The "Usable area of the glasses [was] very limited" (P3), referring to the limited field of view of the HoloLens.…”

Section: Desktop Rather Desktop Neutral Rather Param Parammentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The lampshades were printed using an Ultimaker 2+ 3D printer 19 , and the shelf was milled using a Shaper Origin 20 . Both required the use of CAM 21 (computeraided manufacturing) software, which could be integrated into the tool, as demonstrated by works like Mix&Match [108], which included a slicer. Including this step in future evaluations is promising for understanding the breakdowns in transferring a user's design to a manufactured artifact.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…https://ultimaker.com/3d-printers/s-series/ultimaker-2-connect/, Accessed: 24.01.2024 20 https://www.shapertools.com/en-us/origin, Accessed: 25.01.202421 For the lampshades: Ultimaker Cura (https://ultimaker.com/software/ultimakercura/, Accessed: 24.01.2024), and Slicer for Fusion 360 (https://www.autodesk.com/ support/technical/article/caas/tsarticles/ts/3yg7zznS94MHNDG7KMV8Qg.html, Accessed: 25.01.2024) for the shelf.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal Fabrication

Stemasov,

Demharter,

Rädler

et al. 2024

Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extended Reality (XR) allows in-situ previewing of designs to be manufactured through Personal Fabrication (PF). These in-situ interactions exhibit advantages for PF, like incorporating the environment into the design process. However, design-for-fabrication in XR often happens through either highly complex 3D-modeling or is reduced to rudimentary adaptations of crowd-sourced models. We present pARam, a tool combining parametric designs (PDs) and XR, enabling in-situ configuration of artifacts for PF. In contrast to modeling-or search-focused approaches, pARam supports customization through embodied and practical inputs (e.g., gestures, recommendations) and evaluation (e.g., lighting estimation) without demanding complex 3D-modeling skills. We implemented pARam for HoloLens 2 and evaluated it (𝑛 = 20), comparing XR and desktop conditions. Users succeeded in choosing context-related parameters and took their environment into account for their configuration using pARam. We reflect on the prospects and challenges of PDs in XR to streamline complex design methods for PF while retaining suitable expressivity. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Mixed / augmented reality; Interaction design.

show abstract

Section: Desktop Rather Desktop Neutral Rather Param Parammentioning

confidence: 69%

Section: Design In and For Extended Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Desktop Rather Desktop Neutral Rather Param Parammentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal Fabrication

Stemasov,

Demharter,

Rädler

et al. 2024

Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Skill and Knowledge Sharing in Cyber-Augmented Collaborative Physical Work Systems with HUB-CI

Ajidarma,

Nof

2023

Systems Collaboration and Integration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decision support for augmented reality-based assistance systems deployment in industrial settings

Bock,

Bohné,

Tadeja

2024

Multimed Tools Appl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The successful deployment of augmented reality (AR) in the industry for on-the-job guidance depends heavily on factors such as the availability of required expertise, existing digital content and other deployment-related criteria such as a task’s error-proneness or complexity. Particularly in idiosyncratic manufacturing situations involving customised products and diverse complex and non-complex products and its variants, the applicability and attractiveness of AR as a worker assistance system is often unclear and difficult to gauge for decision-makers. To address this gap, we developed a decision support tool to help prepare customised deployment strategies for AR-based assistance systems utilising manual assembly as the main example. Consequently, we report results from an interview study with sixteen domain experts. Furthermore, when analysing captured expert knowledge, we found significant differences in criteria weighting based on task complexity and other factors, such as the effort required to obtain data.

show abstract

ProcessAR: An augmented reality-based tool to create in-situ procedural 2D/3D AR Instructions

Cited by 18 publications

References 43 publications

pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal Fabrication

pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal Fabrication

Skill and Knowledge Sharing in Cyber-Augmented Collaborative Physical Work Systems with HUB-CI

Decision support for augmented reality-based assistance systems deployment in industrial settings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About