Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing III 2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.599865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process-window sensitive full-chip inspection for design-to-silicon optimization in the sub-wavelength era

Abstract: As lithographers continue to implement more exotic and complex Resolution Enhancement Techniques (RET) to push patterning further beyond the physical limits of optical lithography, full-chip brightfield inspections are becoming increasingly valuable to help identify random and systematic defects that occur due to mask tolerance excursions, OPC inaccuracies, RET design errors, or unmanufacturable layout configurations. PWQ, or Process Window Qualification, is a KLA-Tencor product* using brightfield imaging insp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a long time bright-field imaging "optical" inspection (using light in the DUV wavelength range) was used for process window qualification (PWQ) of new masks. 10,11) Even though the smallest hotspots cannot be resolved at DUV wavelengths, as long as they generate a pixel-intensity difference when compared to an image at the same position in a different die, they flag the presence of a hotspot (at least if the defect is not systematically the same in all dies). PWQ compares dies exposed at off-nominal dose-focus conditions with dies exposed at nominal conditions, thus identifying hotspots that occur at the edges of the process window.…”
Section: On-wafer Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time bright-field imaging "optical" inspection (using light in the DUV wavelength range) was used for process window qualification (PWQ) of new masks. 10,11) Even though the smallest hotspots cannot be resolved at DUV wavelengths, as long as they generate a pixel-intensity difference when compared to an image at the same position in a different die, they flag the presence of a hotspot (at least if the defect is not systematically the same in all dies). PWQ compares dies exposed at off-nominal dose-focus conditions with dies exposed at nominal conditions, thus identifying hotspots that occur at the edges of the process window.…”
Section: On-wafer Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defects that appear at conditions close to nominal get a high priority and are reviewed. As a result, PWQ is able to detect even small defects caused by mask or OPC (optical proximity correction) and process marginalities [3]. Both the optimization of the recipe and the analysis are done manually by an experienced engineer and are time-consuming.…”
Section: Pwqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common lithography learning methods are FEM (Focus Exposure Matrix) [1,2] and PWQ (Process Window Qualification) [2][3][4][5]. Traditionally FEM utilizes a few locations per die to define the best dose and focus based on CD (critical dimension) measurements analyzed on a Bossung plot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, PWQ typically utilizes a high-sensitivity broadband brighfield inspector, a methodology which has proven effective for identifying critical design errors. 2,3,4 Innovative techniques for darkfield patterned wafer inspection 5 have improved the defect detection capabilities of these tools on lithography layers. Recent studies showed that a darkfield imaging inspector provided the necessary sensitivity and noise suppression capabilities for litho process monitoring at high throughputs.…”
Section: Pwq Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%