2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process supporting strategic decision-making in systemic transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Paper IV used empirical data collected with a Delphi survey, employing a web-based questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, which utilised the system transition roadmap introduced by Auvinen et al (2015). The general aim of the Delphi is to obtain the expertise, opinions and arguments of a specific group (van de Linde and van der Duin 2011).…”
Section: Descriptive and Participative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Paper IV used empirical data collected with a Delphi survey, employing a web-based questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, which utilised the system transition roadmap introduced by Auvinen et al (2015). The general aim of the Delphi is to obtain the expertise, opinions and arguments of a specific group (van de Linde and van der Duin 2011).…”
Section: Descriptive and Participative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, analytical frameworks are needed to guide the analysis of transition processes. The Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) [28,29] is an analytical framework that can guide data collection and the gathering of relevant information (e.g., Auvinen et al [30]). Various transition scholars have applied the MLP to analyze elements of past transition processes including niches (e.g., sustainability innovations), regime elements and landscape signals (e.g., References [31,32]).…”
Section: Step 1: Problem and Actor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-technical scenarios were initially used together with the multilevel perspective (Geels, 2002) and focused on niche/regime developments. This has evolved into a form of scenario that offers a more qualitative approach and considers both technology and society (Hillman and Sandén, 2008), and can combine quantitative and qualitative analysis (Auvinen et al, 2015). It also has the potential to include storylines to describe the scenarios and relate them to the context (Weimer-Jehle et al, 2016), as well as explaining development processes rather than just final outcomes (Hillman and Sandén, 2008).…”
Section: Socio-technical Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%