2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process refinement contributed more than parameter optimization to improve the CoLM's performance in simulating the carbon and water fluxes in a grassland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it considers various biogeochemical, biogeophysical, and hydrological processes between the land‐atmosphere interface, the CoLM can capture key parameters such as soil moisture, sensible, latent heat fluxes, and canopy assimilation rate of photosynthesis (i.e., GPP) (Dai et al., 2003). Worldwide comprehensive validation has shown that the CoLM has competent performance in simulating GPP dynamics at the global scale (Chen et al., 2011; Li et al., 2020) (see also Figure S1 in Supporting Information S1). To drive CoLM, climate forcing (e.g., precipitation, temperature, radiation, and humidity) and land surface background (e.g., LULC, leaf area index (LAI), soil property, and topography) are needed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it considers various biogeochemical, biogeophysical, and hydrological processes between the land‐atmosphere interface, the CoLM can capture key parameters such as soil moisture, sensible, latent heat fluxes, and canopy assimilation rate of photosynthesis (i.e., GPP) (Dai et al., 2003). Worldwide comprehensive validation has shown that the CoLM has competent performance in simulating GPP dynamics at the global scale (Chen et al., 2011; Li et al., 2020) (see also Figure S1 in Supporting Information S1). To drive CoLM, climate forcing (e.g., precipitation, temperature, radiation, and humidity) and land surface background (e.g., LULC, leaf area index (LAI), soil property, and topography) are needed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, discrepancies still exist among LSMs because of their different hydrological and biophysical parameterizations schemes, insufficiently expressed land surface processes so far, as well as uncertainties in regional driven data [21]. Fortunately, their simulation accuracy is being improved in recent years by process refinement, parameter optimization and assimilation with remotely sensed observations [22][23][24]. Compared to the LE (i.e., EvapoTranspiration (ET)), few long-term global H estimations are available because of the lack of surface parameters that are difficult to measure directly, such as the thermal roughness length imposing a dynamic impact on turbulent exchange efficiency by controlling the lower boundary conditions at the land-atmosphere interface [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%