2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process performance optimization and mathematical modelling of a SBR-MBBR treatment at low oxygen concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total nitrogen removal was mainly due to the SND process in the reactor. In particular, when the aeration phase was turned off, the DO in the reactor decreased from about 2-3 to 0 mg•L −1 Once the biofilm was growing, the invariance of the data of organic removal performance confirms the results reported by other authors concerning the intermittent aeration strategy applied to other installations [20,21]. Therefore, the HMBBR under intermittent aeration showed that the growth of heterotrophic biomass as biofilm is a further advantage in terms of COD removal and biological process stability.…”
Section: Nitrification and Denitrification Phenomenasupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total nitrogen removal was mainly due to the SND process in the reactor. In particular, when the aeration phase was turned off, the DO in the reactor decreased from about 2-3 to 0 mg•L −1 Once the biofilm was growing, the invariance of the data of organic removal performance confirms the results reported by other authors concerning the intermittent aeration strategy applied to other installations [20,21]. Therefore, the HMBBR under intermittent aeration showed that the growth of heterotrophic biomass as biofilm is a further advantage in terms of COD removal and biological process stability.…”
Section: Nitrification and Denitrification Phenomenasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The organic removal performance increased slowly with the growth of attached biomass: the average organic removal increased from 81% to 87% during the continuous aeration period (Phase I), and 93%-95% in the subsequent periods with intermittent aeration, despite the increase in OLR in the Periods 2B and 3B. Once the biofilm was growing, the invariance of the data of organic removal performance confirms the results reported by other authors concerning the intermittent aeration strategy applied to other installations [20,21]. Therefore, the HMBBR under intermittent aeration showed that the growth of heterotrophic biomass as biofilm is a further advantage in terms of COD removal and biological process stability.…”
Section: Cod Removal and Biomass Growthsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…[15,16]. To date, various variants of technological purification schemes have been developed using the principles of nitrification and denitrification [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This yield is significantly lower than the sludge yield of conventional activated sludge processes. Table 2 presents the sludge yield comparison between multi-stage AO biofilm process with other activated sludge processes (Ferrentino, Ferraro, Rosaria Mattei, Esposito, & Andreottola, 2018;Fujii, 1996;Yonglei et al, 2018Yonglei et al, , 2014Zhen et al, 2014). It can be seen that the sludge mass generated in multi-stage A/O biofilm reactor with a new type of floating spherical carriers was much lower than other biofilm processes, such as traditional A/O process and sequencing batch reactor (SBR)-MBBR system.…”
Section: Sludge Reduction Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%