2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process performance evaluation and classification via in-situ melt pool monitoring in directed energy deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second strategy concerned the in situ data coming from the sensor systems monitoring the melt pool and process environment. Due to the extreme physical conditions in DED-L, the in situ monitoring is prone to noise as lots of outliers can be expected throughout an experimental run [6]. As the goal of the present study is the overall evaluation of process stability across multiple DED-L print jobs, critical boundaries have to be defined within which a print job can be deemed acceptable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second strategy concerned the in situ data coming from the sensor systems monitoring the melt pool and process environment. Due to the extreme physical conditions in DED-L, the in situ monitoring is prone to noise as lots of outliers can be expected throughout an experimental run [6]. As the goal of the present study is the overall evaluation of process stability across multiple DED-L print jobs, critical boundaries have to be defined within which a print job can be deemed acceptable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical quality issues associated with DED-L are porosity, residual stress, cracking, and the high surface roughness of the final parts [4]. This missing process stability associated with DED-L can be correlated with the complex physical phenomena involved in the laser-powder interaction as well as the cyclic thermal loading of the layer-wise manufacturing process [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ertay et al [294] developed a classifier that uses affordable machine vision sensing to categorize process signatures into specific zones, including under-melt, conduction, keyhole, and balling, to prevent instabilities, defects, and anomalies during the process. Statistical measures including average, standard deviation, and Root Mean Square, derived from various data types like process physics, signatures, and ex situ data (with a microscope), were used to formulate process maps.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Defects Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DED-related processes have different levels of in-situ control: recent research monitored the melting pool geometry during wire arc additive manufacturing to control for the bead's geometry and symmetry [31]; additional research was conducted on the use of a structured light system in the development of a real-time monitoring tool to aid the repair of an engine component [32]. Moreover, research towards establishing process maps that guide the deposition process towards avoiding lack-of-fusion and keyhole porosities has been conducted [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%