2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-020-02751-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process parameters influence on cutting force and surface roughness during hybrid laser- and ultrasonic elliptical vibration-assisted machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 15 displays a chart comparing the cutting forces of these four processes in the tangential, radial, and feed directions. While the reduction in cutting forces is significant with the implementation of LUAM, it is important to carefully select the processing parameters, as achieving a lower surface quality requires thorough consideration [ 219 ]. The cutting force, radial force, and feed force all decrease with an increase in laser power.…”
Section: Hybrid Machining Of Sicp/almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 15 displays a chart comparing the cutting forces of these four processes in the tangential, radial, and feed directions. While the reduction in cutting forces is significant with the implementation of LUAM, it is important to carefully select the processing parameters, as achieving a lower surface quality requires thorough consideration [ 219 ]. The cutting force, radial force, and feed force all decrease with an increase in laser power.…”
Section: Hybrid Machining Of Sicp/almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study [27], they implemented a design of experiments, where a genetic algorithm (GA) was used to optimise material removal rate (MMR) under certain Ra limits, but this was only investigated for the LUAM at cutting speeds between 10 and 25 m/min. Research by Khajahzadeh et al [28] explored the use of UAM, LAM, and LUAM applied to the turning of a 4340 steel alloy through various designs of experiments to understand the relationships between cutting and hybrid process parameters on cutting force and surface finish. They found that LAM was more effective than LUAM in improving surface finish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khajehzadeh et al utilized laser and elliptical vibration energies, simultaneously in the turning process to analyze the machining forces and surface roughness. Statistical analysis revealed a 75% reduction in machining forces and a 35% reduction in surface roughness for the hybrid machining process than the CT process [22]. Deswal and Kant combined laser and ultrasonic vibration energies in the feed direction, simultaneously in the turning process and found improvement in machining forces, chip morphology, and surface roughness for the hybrid machining process than that of the CT process [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%