Process parameter optimization of metal additive manufacturing: a review and outlook

Abstract

The selection of appropriate process parameters is crucial in metal additive manufacturing (AM) as it directly influences the defect formation and microstructure of the printed part. Over the past decade, research efforts have been devoted to identifying "optimal" processing regimes for different materials to achieve defect-free manufacturing, which mostly involve costly trial-and-error experiments and computationally expensive mechanistic simulations. Hence, it is apropos to critically review the methods used to achieve the optimal process parameters in AM. This work seeks to provide a structured analysis of current methodologies and discuss systematic approaches toward general optimization work in AM and the process parameter optimization of new AM alloys. A brief review of process-induced defects due to process parameter selection is given and the current methods for identifying "optimal processing windows" are summarized. Research works are analyzed under a standard optimization framework, including the design of experiments and characterization, modelling and optimization algorithms. The research gaps that preclude multi-objective optimization in AM are identified and future directions toward optimization work in AM are discussed. With growing capabilities in AM, we should reconsider what the definition of the "optimal processing region".

Multimetal Research in Powder Bed Fusion: A Review

“…They can act as a thermal barrier, controlling the rate of heat transfer to adjacent regions of the part. This controlled heat transfer can mitigate the formation of thermal gradients, which can lead to porosity, and promote more uniform solidification [ 70 ]. For instance, a sacrificial support material can be printed alongside the main material, which can be removed after printing.…”

Adaptable multi-objective optimization framework: application to metal additive manufacturing

“…More advanced multivariate techniques, such as design of experiments (DoE), are required [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. DoE has been used to optimize a variety of properties in AM, including porosity, surface roughness, fatigue life, and melt pool dimensions [20]. However, classical DoE methods have limited flexibility and efficiency, and they rely on statistical assumptions that may not always be guaranteed [21,22].…”

Metal Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion Process Development Using Optical Tomography

“…These standard parameters do not, however, consider part-specific needs that enable the reliable manufacturing of required challenging features. To some extent, operators can perform experience-based tuning to enhance manufacturing [23,24].…”