2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process optimization for producing hierarchical porous bamboo-derived carbon materials with ultrahigh specific surface area for lithium-sulfur batteries

Abstract: Process optimization for producing hierarchical porous bamboo-derived carbon materials with ultrahigh specific surface area for lithium-sulfur batteries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high sulfur utilization and cycling performance is much better than most previously reported high sulfur loading cathodes . In contrast, the S/NCNT@SnS 2 electrodes remaining capacity and capacity retention are only 346 mA h g −1 and 32.7% (calculated based on the fifth cycle), respectively . Figure S14 (Supporting Information) demonstrates that the energy efficiency of S/NCNT@Co‐SnS 2 electrodes is higher than that of S/NCNT@SnS 2 electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The high sulfur utilization and cycling performance is much better than most previously reported high sulfur loading cathodes . In contrast, the S/NCNT@SnS 2 electrodes remaining capacity and capacity retention are only 346 mA h g −1 and 32.7% (calculated based on the fifth cycle), respectively . Figure S14 (Supporting Information) demonstrates that the energy efficiency of S/NCNT@Co‐SnS 2 electrodes is higher than that of S/NCNT@SnS 2 electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) measurement data were also analyzed by different models including density functional theory (DFT), Langmuir, Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH), and Satio–Foley (SF). The reasons for recalculation were that those methods were more suitable for calculation of micro‐ or mesopores . The results are also listed in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But they still cannot satisfy the urgent requirements for emerging technology, such as large‐scale energy storage and electric vehicles (EVs) . Because of the ultrahigh theoretical capacity (1675 mAh g −1 ) and theoretical energy density (2600 Wh kg −1 ) of sulfur cathode materials, lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries have drawn considerable attention with the assistance of abundance in nature and environment‐friendliness of S …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 But they still cannot satisfy the urgent requirements for emerging technology, such as largescale energy storage and electric vehicles (EVs). 3 Because of the ultrahigh theoretical capacity (1675 mAh g −1 ) and theoretical energy density (2600 Wh kg −1 ) of sulfur cathode materials, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have drawn considerable attention with the assistance of abundance in nature and environment-friendliness of S. 4,5 Despite these advantages of S cathodes, some drawbacks still hinder the practical application of Li-S batteries, such as (a) the poor electrical insulation of S (5 × 10 −30 S cm −1 at 25°C) and corresponding sulfides during cycling 6,7 ; (b) the noticeable volume changes (80%) of S cathode during the cycling 8 ; and (c) the dissolution of intermediates, as known, polysulfide (Li 2 S x , 4 ≤ x ≤ 8), 9 which would shuttle between two electrodes, leading to severe capacity fading and the deterioration of electrochemical performance. 10,11 Many research work have been made to solve these aforementioned problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%