Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed Thermography 2018
DOI: 10.21611/qirt.2018.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process Monitoring of Additive Manufacturing by Using Optical Tomography

Abstract: Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is a 3D-printing-process which provides the possibility to construct complex geometries by layered manufacturing of components with metallic powder. At MTU Aero Engines the optical tomography (OT) was developed as an Online Process Monitoring system which documents the complete welding process during the SLM fabrication procedure. Some details of the camera-system are shown. To create probability of detection (POD) curves, different specimens are investigated with digital radiogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; EOSTATE PowderBed records image of powder bed after re-coating and after exposure; EOSTATE MeltPool sampled melt emission at 400-900 nm; EOSTATE Exposure OT integrated melt emission at 900 nm. The principles of OT technique are simple [18][19][20]: an optical sCMOS (scientific complementary metaloxide semiconductor) camera with high lateral resolution is exploited to captures thermal radiation signal of the top layer during the laser PBF melting and solidification process. A near infrared band-pass filter (narrow band with center 900 nm and half width 25 nm) is used to separates thermal radiation from the other emissions e.g., plasma emissions and back reflected laser light (1060 nm).…”
Section: Eostate Exposure Ot Monitoring Images and 3d Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; EOSTATE PowderBed records image of powder bed after re-coating and after exposure; EOSTATE MeltPool sampled melt emission at 400-900 nm; EOSTATE Exposure OT integrated melt emission at 900 nm. The principles of OT technique are simple [18][19][20]: an optical sCMOS (scientific complementary metaloxide semiconductor) camera with high lateral resolution is exploited to captures thermal radiation signal of the top layer during the laser PBF melting and solidification process. A near infrared band-pass filter (narrow band with center 900 nm and half width 25 nm) is used to separates thermal radiation from the other emissions e.g., plasma emissions and back reflected laser light (1060 nm).…”
Section: Eostate Exposure Ot Monitoring Images and 3d Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different sensors, e.g., acoustic sensors [8,9], high resolution optical camera [10][11][12], high speed camera [13], infrared thermography [14][15][16], infrared (IR) camera [17], optical tomography [18][19][20][21], synchrotron X-ray [22,23], etc., can be applied for the monitoring of the L-PBF process. These sensors reveal diverse phenomena of the powder bed and melt pool: e.g., powder bed surface topography (before and after exposure), spattering, balling, pore formation, cracking, and deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical Tomography in AM was originally developed for quality assurance, in which validation of the print result is performed through the thermal history monitoring of consecutive builds [30]. The first build is quality-controlled, and after this, the identical thermal history of subsequent builds can be declared successful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zenzinger et al [26] were able to capture the thermal emissions of the melting process by using a CMOS camera equipped with a suitable band pass filter. Deviations in the signals derived from optical tomography (OT) were attributed to welding disturbances, which were correlated to micro computed tomography (µCT) data in [30] and data from digital radiography [31]. They achieved a pixel size of approximately 0.1 mm × 0.1 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They achieved a pixel size of approximately 0.1 mm × 0.1 mm. However, a detailed high-resolution signal to defect correlation is not yet possible [31]. Due to their longtime exposure concept, their system differs from infrared camera systems with high temporal dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%