2014
DOI: 10.12928/telkomnika.v12i4.811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process Improvement of LSA for Semantic Relatedness Computing

Abstract: Tang poetry semantic correlation computing is critical in many applications, such as searching, clustering, automatic generation of poetry and so on. Aiming to increase computing efficiency and accuracy of semantic relatedness, we improved the process of latent semantic analysis (LSA). In this paper, we adopted "representation of words semantic" instead of "words-by-poems" to The ability to quantify semantic relatedness of words in poems should be an integral part of semantic analysis, and underlies many fun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuzzy based spam filtering in email which not require training of data set in advance, it used the clustering mechanism based on fuzzy logic [14]. Here [19] author gives the idea about latent semantic analysis and it is for finding the similar words in the poetry and analyzing the emotional relatedness. In [20] based on semantic language author proposed cooccurence search engine for Chinese-tibetan and monitor that bases on semantic language but they are not given detail idea about semantic annotation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy based spam filtering in email which not require training of data set in advance, it used the clustering mechanism based on fuzzy logic [14]. Here [19] author gives the idea about latent semantic analysis and it is for finding the similar words in the poetry and analyzing the emotional relatedness. In [20] based on semantic language author proposed cooccurence search engine for Chinese-tibetan and monitor that bases on semantic language but they are not given detail idea about semantic annotation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%