Process evaluation of the implementation of a decision support system to prevent and treat disease-related malnutrition in a hospital setting

Abstract

Background Malnutrition is present in 30% of hospitalized patients and has adverse outcomes for the patient and the healthcare system. The current practice for nutritional care is associated with many barriers. The MyFood decision support system was developed to prevent and treat malnutrition. Methods This paper reports on a process evaluation that was completed within an effectiveness trial. MyFood is a digital tool with an interface consisting of an app and a website. MyFood includes functions to record and evaluate dietary intake. It also provides reports to nurses, including tailored recommendations for nutritional treatment. We used an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design in a randomized controlled trial. The RE-AIM (Reach, Efficiency, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework was used to perform a process evaluation alongside the randomized controlled trial, using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. An implementation plan, including implementation strategies, was developed to plan and guide the study. Results Reach: In total, 88% of eligible patients consented to participate (n = 100). Adoption: Approximately 75% of the nurses signed up to use MyFood and 50% used the reports. Implementation: MyFood empowered the patients in their nutritional situation and acted as a motivation to eat to reach their nutritional target. The compliance of using MyFood was higher among the patients than the nurses. A barrier for use of MyFood among the nurses was different digital systems which were not integrated and the log-in procedure to the MyFood website. Despite limited use by some nurses, the majority of the nurses claimed that MyFood was useful, better than the current practice, and should be implemented in the healthcare system. Conclusions This study used a process evaluation to interpret the results of a randomized controlled trial more in-depth. The patients were highly compliant, however, the compliance was lower among the nurses. MyFood empowered the patients in their nutritional situation, the usability was considered as high, and the experiences and attitudes towards MyFood were primarily positive. Focus on strategies to improve the nurses’ compliance may in the future improve the MyFood system’s potential. Trial registration The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov 26/01/2018 (NCT03412695).

Launch of the Norwegian Network for Implementation Research (NIMP): Proceedings from the First Annual Conference

“…Research communities or groups conducting implementation research have formed around universities and other educational institutions and research and quality improvement organizations across the country. These research groups do implementation research in healthcare (e.g., Graverholt et al, 2021;Diehl et al, 2016), mental and behavioral health (e.g., Egeland et al, 2017;Ogden et al, 2018), digital health technologies (e.g., Varsi et al, 2015;Dugstad et al, 2019;Paulsen et al, 2021), education (e.g., Ertesvåg et al, 2010), and child welfare services (e.g., Engell et al, 2018).…”

Early Antibiotic Exposure Is Not Detrimental to Therapeutic Effect from Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

“…Monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death-1 receptor/ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) and the cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 are capable of inducing tumor immune rejection [4]. However, inhibition of neither of these targets alone is sufficient to translate into significant survival benefit in patients with HCC [5], a finding that has paved the way for the development of immunotherapy combinations such as atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the only regimen associated with an improvement in patient’s survival compared to standard of care sorafenib [6].…”

Implementation and evaluation of an individualized physical exercise promotion program in people with manifested risk factors for multimorbidity (MultiPill-Exercise): a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

“…The chosen pragmatic randomized controlled trial design is intended not only to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention, but also to provide information on how the intervention works and how the intervention and its implementation in its specific context are influenced by various barriers and facilitating factors [ 69 , 70 ]. Particularly for complex interventions such as MultiPill-Exercise , which are composed of multiple interacting components, determining the causes of change (primary action mechanisms) and identifying conditions for success (contextual factors) are key.…”