Process Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Care Program for Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Surgery

Abstract

Purpose This study describes the process evaluation of an innovative multidisciplinary care program for patients undergoing benign gynaecologic surgery. This care program aims at improving recovery and preventing delayed return to work and consists of two steps: (1) an interactive e-health intervention for all participants, and (2) integrated clinical and occupational care management for those participants whose sick leave exceeds 10 weeks. Methods Eligible for this study were employed women aged between 18–65 years scheduled for a laparoscopic adnexal surgery and/or hysterectomy. Data were collected from patients, their supervisors and their gynaecologists, by means of electronic questionnaires during a 6 month follow-up period and an automatically generated, detailed weblog of the patient web portal (www.ikherstel.nl). Investigated process measures included: reach, dose delivered, dose received, and fidelity. In addition, attitudes towards the intervention were explored among all stakeholders. Results 215 patients enrolled in the study and accounted to a reach of 60.2 % (215/357). All intervention group patients used their account at least once and total time spent on the patient web portal was almost 2 h for each patient (median 118 min, IQR 64–173 min). Most patients visited the website several times (median 11 times, IQR 6–16). Perceived effectiveness among patients was high (74 %). In addition, gynaecologists (76 %) and employers (61 %) were satisfied with the web portal as well. Implementation of the second step of the intervention was suboptimal. Motivating patients to consent to additional guidance and developing an accurate return-to-work-prognosis were two important obstacles. Conclusions The results of this study indicate good feasibility for implementation on a broad scale of the e-health intervention for patients undergoing benign gynaecological surgery. To enhance the implementation of the second step of the perioperative care program, adaptations in the integrated care protocol are needed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-013-9475-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Integrated care programmes for sport and work participation, performance of physical activities and quality of life among orthopaedic surgery patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

“…This renders the clinical relevance of the effect sizes from our quantitative analysis questionable. In contrast, clinically relevant improvements in QoL are described after integrated care interventions, compared with usual care, among non-surgical back pain patients41 42 and patients undergoing abdominal or gynaecological surgeries 43–45. Studies reporting on interventions of e/mHealth34 35 and, in particular in combination with active referral or goal setting,24 showed additional effectiveness in reducing pain and pain interference.…”

Cancer@Work — a nurse-led, stepped-care, e-health intervention to enhance the return to work of patients with cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

“…Numerous studies have demonstrated that e-health is a suitable way of delivering self-management interventions for various conditions, including cancer [ 20 , 21 ], and to deal with various problems, including return to work [ 22 , 23 ]. In addition, e-health proved suitable for delivering an integrative-care management intervention as well [ 24 ]. Based on these findings, we choose to deliver the intervention as an e-health intervention.…”

Enhancing the Return to Work of Cancer Survivors: Development and Feasibility of the Nurse-Led eHealth Intervention Cancer@Work

“…However, collaboration can also be established using a secure website, where stakeholders can work together toward a common goal and share the necessary information to achieve this. In the eHealth intervention developed by Vonk Noordegraaf et al [ 14 ], almost half of the participants invited their supervisor to be involved in the eHealth intervention and that approximately 60% of the supervisors took this opportunity [ 30 ].…”