2024
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process Evaluation of a Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Ultra‐Low‐Dose Treatment for Hypertension Within a Federally Qualified Health Center Network (QUARTET USA)

Olutobi A. Sanuade,
Tyler A. Jacobson,
Adriana Quintana
et al.

Abstract: Background This convergent parallel‐design mixed‐methods process evaluation of the QUARTET USA (Quadruple Ultra‐Low‐Dose Treatment for Hypertension USA) clinical trial (NCT03640312) explores patient and health care professional perceptions about the use of low‐dose quadruple therapy (LDQT) as a novel strategy for hypertension management. Methods and Results A survey of all 62 patients enrolled in the QUARTET USA trial was conducted. A subsample of 13 pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, the study used a type I hybrid, phase II randomized (1:1), double-blind trial design to evaluate efficacy and safety of a quarter-dose combination of four blood pressure lowering drugs with a corresponding process evaluation to understand factors related to trial implementation and study drug acceptability. The results of the process evaluation have been reported separately [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the study used a type I hybrid, phase II randomized (1:1), double-blind trial design to evaluate efficacy and safety of a quarter-dose combination of four blood pressure lowering drugs with a corresponding process evaluation to understand factors related to trial implementation and study drug acceptability. The results of the process evaluation have been reported separately [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%