2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process development of periplasmatically produced single chain fragment variable against epidermal growth factor receptor in Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in contrast to what was observed by Lindner et al. for anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor scFv with p I of 7.4, which likely has a different spatial distribution of electrostatic potential and spatial hydrophobicity. As a result of poor recovery from Capto MMC™, MEP HyperCel™ was chosen as a candidate for capture.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was in contrast to what was observed by Lindner et al. for anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor scFv with p I of 7.4, which likely has a different spatial distribution of electrostatic potential and spatial hydrophobicity. As a result of poor recovery from Capto MMC™, MEP HyperCel™ was chosen as a candidate for capture.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…No scFv protein was found in the FT and recovery from the resin was only possible at both high conductivity and high pH such as during CIP procedure with 0.5 M sodium hydroxide. This was in contrast to what was observed by Lindner et al [20] for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor scFv with pI of 7.4, which likely has a different spatial distribution of electrostatic potential and spatial hydrophobicity. As a result of poor recovery from Capto MMC TM , MEP HyperCel TM was chosen as a candidate for capture.…”
Section: Capture Of Scfv From Hek293 Feedstockcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A combination of these methods allowed the extraction of 70% of scFv from E. coli biomass [240]. Some physical, chemical, and biochemical methods are known, mainly from the isolation of the periplasmic fraction in a small scale.…”
Section: Downstream Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%