2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process dependent porosity and the influence of shot peening on porosity morphology regarding selective laser melted AlSi10Mg parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P2 and P3 specimens were built along two directions, namely XY and Z as defined in Figure 1-a. P2 fatigue test specimens were machined (MA) from the bars in order to overcome the manufacturing gross surface integrity effects, namely the surface roughness and the presence of a population of defects in the subsurface due to edge lasing [5,6]. One bar corresponds to one specimen.…”
Section: Samples Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P2 and P3 specimens were built along two directions, namely XY and Z as defined in Figure 1-a. P2 fatigue test specimens were machined (MA) from the bars in order to overcome the manufacturing gross surface integrity effects, namely the surface roughness and the presence of a population of defects in the subsurface due to edge lasing [5,6]. One bar corresponds to one specimen.…”
Section: Samples Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AlMangour et al [17] reported that SP improves the surface roughness, hardness, fatigue, and yield strength of additively manufactured 17-4 stainless steel. Damon et al [18] also studied the effect of SP on the porosity formed inside AlSi10Mg parts. They showed that SP using S170 steel beads reduces the porosity by 0.1-0.3% and increases the fatigue strength of the as-built parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrastingly, diffraction methods (such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) [10] and neutron diffraction (ND) [11,12]) are non-destructive. They can be used to obtain full-field strain/stress distribution by measuring at multiple positions on the sample surface [13][14][15][16] or can be combined with material removal techniques to acquire the in-depth distribution of residual stresses [17][18][19][20][21]. Nowadays, XRD becomes major non-destructive residual stresses measurement method because of its relative affordability and easy accessibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%