2018
DOI: 10.1108/tqm-10-2017-0123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process complexity as a future challenge – a quality management perspective

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to integrate process complexity as an object of analysis within effective quality management (QM). Design/methodology/approach This paper systematically analyzes different conceptions of complexity theory and characterizes process complexity from a QM perspective producing new insights how to address process complexity for continuous improvement. Findings The authors identified and specified four complexity characteristics, which we integrated in a holistic process comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in the wine sector, blockchain technology allows firms in the value chain to obtain certifications regarding the origin of the raw materials and their product and process quality. This technology allows firms to adapt to the customer needs and new perceptions about quality and environmental aspects (Shah et al, 2019) and thus align their processes with stakeholder requirements to achieve effective quality management (Kuhn et al, 2018).…”
Section: Digitalization and Quality As Regards Bnc Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in the wine sector, blockchain technology allows firms in the value chain to obtain certifications regarding the origin of the raw materials and their product and process quality. This technology allows firms to adapt to the customer needs and new perceptions about quality and environmental aspects (Shah et al, 2019) and thus align their processes with stakeholder requirements to achieve effective quality management (Kuhn et al, 2018).…”
Section: Digitalization and Quality As Regards Bnc Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that quality management can play an important role in the way of improvement, namely identifying innovative paths to provide a better workplace culture [39]. Thus, it is known that traditional QM practices showed to be inefficient when applied in the context of complex processes [73]. Hence, some authors, such as Brown [39], Antony [74], Shin et al [75], among others, explore the future direction of the quality movement, which will have to take into account the quality of products manufactured [76] in the era of the digital economy [77,78], that is related to Industry 4.0 [31,[79][80][81][82][83], with a lot of influence on the future of employment [11].Thus, the direction of quality in the future is then explored by identifying a big number of questions that have probably a great impact on quality in most of the organizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many external stakeholders participate in mega projects, including but not limited to investors, contractors, governments and suppliers, which will cause social conflicts as a cause of complexity to be occurred. https://doi.org/10.15405/epms.2019.12.6 Corresponding Author: Mohammad Mohseni Selection and peer-review under & Hertogh, 2018;Callegari, Szklo, & Schaeffer, 2018;Dao et al, 2016;Eriksson et al, 2017;Forozandeh, Ebrahim, & Makui, 2018;Hartono, 2018;He, Luo, Hu, & Chan, 2015;Hu et al, 2015;Abdou et al, 2016;Kuhn, Schaefer, & Otten, 2018;Lessard, Sakhrani, & Miller, 2014;Makui, Zadeh, Bagherpour, & Jabbarzadeh, 2018;Maylor & Turner, 2017;Mikkelsen, 2018;Mirza & Ehsan, 2017;Mok, Shen, & Yang, 2015;Mozaffari, Fazli, & Sedaghat-Seresht, 2012;Nguyen et al, Ambiguity in the domain the dynamics of work activities 5 (Bakhshi et al, 2016;Bjorvatn & Wald 2018;Bosch-Rekveldt et al, 2018;Callegari et al, 2018;Dao et al 2016;Eriksson et al 2017;Forozandeh et al, 2018;Habibi, Barzinpour, & Sadjadi, 2018;Hartono 2018;He et al, 2015;Invernizzi, Locatelli, Gronqvis, & Brookes, 2019;Abdou et al, 2016;Kuhn et al, 2018;Lehtinen, Peltokorpi, & Artto, 2019;…”
Section: Step 3 • Review Journals and Top Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number of specializations involved in the project, 4 (Bjorvatn & Wald 2018;Bosch-Rekveldt et al, 2018;Callegari et al, 2018;Dao et al, 2016;Eriksson et al, 2017;Forozandeh et al, 2018;Habibi et al, 2018;Hartono, 2018;He et al, 2015;Hu et al, 2015;Abdou et al, 2016;Kuhn et al, 2018;Lessard et al, 2014;Li et al, 2018;Makui et al, 2018;Maylor & Turner, 2017;Mirza & Ehsan, 2017;Mok et al, 2015;Mozaffari et al, 2012;Nachbagauer & Schirl-Boeck, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2015;Qazi et https://doi.org/10.15405/epms.2019.12.6 Corresponding Author: Mohammad Mohseni Selection and peer-review under 14 al., 2016;Qiu et al, 2019;Rolstadås & Schiefloe 2017;Senescu et al, 2013;Shahhossein et al, 2017;Sheffield et al, 2012;Shi et al 2018;Silva, Akchurin, & Bebbington, 2018;Sridarran et al, 2017;Turner & Xue, 2018;Zhu & Mostafavi, 2017) Common vision of the project team, 3…”
Section: Referred Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%