Crop Systems Biology 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20562-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process-Based Simulation Models Are Essential Tools for Virtual Profiling and Design of Ideotypes: Example of Fruit and Root

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the notion of ideotype has progressively developed to design plants able to perform in a given production context and finally to define breeding targets. To this end, process-based predictive models have proven their efficiency to unravel the mechanisms behind genetic variability of complex traits (Reymond et al, 2003;Tardieu, 2003, Yin et al, 2010Quilot et al, 2005;Struik et al 2005), to analyze Genotype x Environment x Management (GxExM) interactions (Génard et al 2007;Bertin et al 2010;Martre et al 2011), or to design new ideotypes adapted to specific environments (Kropff et al 1995;Quilot et al 2016;Martre et al 2015;Génard et al 2016).…”
Section: Designing Ideotypes By Ecophysiological Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the notion of ideotype has progressively developed to design plants able to perform in a given production context and finally to define breeding targets. To this end, process-based predictive models have proven their efficiency to unravel the mechanisms behind genetic variability of complex traits (Reymond et al, 2003;Tardieu, 2003, Yin et al, 2010Quilot et al, 2005;Struik et al 2005), to analyze Genotype x Environment x Management (GxExM) interactions (Génard et al 2007;Bertin et al 2010;Martre et al 2011), or to design new ideotypes adapted to specific environments (Kropff et al 1995;Quilot et al 2016;Martre et al 2015;Génard et al 2016).…”
Section: Designing Ideotypes By Ecophysiological Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eco-physiological modelling has been widely used to resolve the complexity of grain yield under different environments (Soltani et al , 1999; Yin and Struik, 2010; Martre et al , 2011), by dissecting grain yield into its component traits or parameters. Most parameters in the model may be controlled genetically; therefore, eco-physiological models are believed to be able to quantify genotype–phenotype relationships for complex traits (Hammer et al , 2006; Bertin et al , 2010; Génard et al , 2016), using dynamic simulation on a daily or even shorter time-step basis. Unlike statistical approaches that require a large number of experiments (although on a single trait) to create a prediction model (Bustos-Korts et al , 2016), eco-physiological modelling can, in principle, rely on one or a few experiments for model parameterization because the prediction is made largely based on eco-physiological principles as captured by the models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the diurnal patterns of Rad and VPD are inconsistent (Gosa et al ., 2019), the sensitivities of Tr to VPD and Rad would have a strong impact on the dynamic Tr profile. Simulation models, which combine many biological functional hypotheses in mathematical frameworks, describe the development of plant traits as a consequence of environmental and genetic interaction (Génard et al ., 2016). Several simulation models for Tr have been established (Katsoulas & Stanghellini, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%