Process architecture development using Riva and ARIS: comparative study

Abstract

Purpose Business process modeling has been given great attention due to its crucial role in developing computer-based systems that support (and automate) organizational processes. In information systems, building the right process architecture is vital, since a poor division of organizational processes can lead to complex designs or incoherent structure. Moreover, process architecture acts as a “big picture” of what the organization does, and represents dynamic relationships between the existing processes, which, in turn, helps understand how the organization works (Ould, 2005). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper discusses the derivation of a process architecture diagram (PAD) using the Riva method in detail, in contrast to the PAD developed using Architecture of Integrated Information Systems (ARIS). The information system selected as an example for this comparative study is in the context of academic libraries, embedding various yet generic library processes. Findings Organizational process architecture provides a basis for business management, based on specific framework supported by integrated tools and methods (Kozina, 2006). ARIS and Riva process architecture methods can be used to visualize and document organizational processes. Understanding the merits and weaknesses of each method is essential to identify possible areas of application. Research limitations/implications The processes selected were generic in most academic libraries not taking into consideration special personalized processes. These can be added though. Practical implications Both techniques are feasible and can be used to view and analyze library processes, allowing bridging the gap between theory and practice. Originality/value A number of process architecture methods are available, however, few studies focused on assessing these methods, and comparing some of them to find out how easy they are to be used in particular contexts, and whether they can be standardized.

Selection of Business Process Modeling Tool with the Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL and TOPSIS Method

“…Depending on the data from Tables 21 and 22, Equations ( 23) and ( 24), the relative distances of each candidate option from the P-I and N-I solutions can be released. Finally, the relative distance of each candidate option to the P-I solution is released depending on Equation (25). The relative distances of each alternative from the P-I and N-I solutions and the result of the relative distance of each alternative from the P-I solution can be seen as Table 23.…”

“…In the 1980s, since the first Framework Program of Research and Development (Esprit program), a large number of languages of BPM have appeared in North America and Europe [11]. These include MERISE [12], GRAI [13][14][15], NIAM [16], CIMOSA [17], IEM [18][19][20], UML [21], BPMN [22], EPC [23], Petri net [19], IDEFx [24], ARIS [25], 4EM [26], DEMO [27] and so on.…”

Management of business processes using stochastic simulation

“…3 Theoretical aspects of process modelling and simulations 3.1 Process modelling Business Process Modelling (BPM) represents the set of technologies and standards that are used in design, execution, administration, and monitoring of business processes [4]. BPM facilitates understanding the organization´s work, comprehends the process in details and then uses technological support for improvements to human activities [14]. The aim of BPM is to develop a model that mirrors the organization functionality of existing or newly and established business processes and can be regarded as a predecessor to business process simulation that is carried out by using simulation tools or software.…”

Método de modelado conceptual de procesos de negocio a niveles ontológico y situado con alcance de arquitectura empresarial

“…• Elementos de la arquitectura: conceptualizan los procesos como caja negra, considerando la interacción entre ellos y con su entorno [28]. • Elementos de secuencias: estructuran el conocimiento de las actividades, condiciones y coordinaciones que ocurren dentro de un proceso [29].…”