2009
DOI: 10.30861/9781407304328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procesos de formación de sitios arqueológicos: tres casos de estudio en la Puna meridional catamarqueña argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
19

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…This first impression can be scientifically confirmed by diatom analysis (e.g., Solá and Morales 2007). Diatoms, however, are most useful when they can tell us something we did not already know (e.g., Kligmann 2009). In this way, diatom analysis can take its rightful—albeit humble, but more reliable—place in ceramic provenance determination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This first impression can be scientifically confirmed by diatom analysis (e.g., Solá and Morales 2007). Diatoms, however, are most useful when they can tell us something we did not already know (e.g., Kligmann 2009). In this way, diatom analysis can take its rightful—albeit humble, but more reliable—place in ceramic provenance determination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these authors, placing small pottery pieces (less than 1 cm 2 ) in a solution of 10% H 3 PO 4 (phosphoric acid) for several days to dissolve the ceramic and recover the diatoms seems to be a better alternative than grinding them. While using H 2 O 2 (hydrogen peroxide) is a proven method for diatoms contained in sediments (e.g., Kligmann 2009), for those contained in shards it poses some problems, since it disintegrates the diatoms. The main difference between both methods is the exposure time.…”
Section: Pitfalls Of Diatom Analysis For Establishing Ceramic Provenancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De los 25 casos conocidos solo cinco provienen del noa. Dentro de estos últimos, dos de ellos corresponden a grandes acumulaciones (más de 1700 especímenes) de pequeños reptiles y ambos conjuntos fueron recuperados en sitios de esta región: lagartijas Kligmann 2009Kligmann , 2015Kligmann et al 1999) y anfisbenas (Albino & Kligmann 2009, Kligmann 2015, Kligmann et al 2013. En los 23 casos restantes se recuperaron unos pocos individuos aislados, identificados como lagartos, serpientes y tortugas (Kligmann 2009(Kligmann , 2015Kligmann & Díaz País 2007;Kligmann et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Ahora bien, a pesar de la gran cantidad de reptiles presentes en la iconografía, los hallazgos de restos faunísticos de estos animales en sitios arqueológicos de la Argentina son escasos. De los 25 casos que conocemos, de los cuales cinco provienen del NOA, solo dos corresponden a grandes acumulaciones (más de 1700 especímenes) de pequeños reptiles, y ambas fueron recuperadas en sitios de esta región: lagartijas Kligmann, 2009Kligmann, , 2015Kligmann, Sesé y Barbadillo, 1999) y anfisbenas (Albino y Kligmann, 2009;Kligmann, 2015;Kligmann, Albino y Díaz País, 2013). Los 23 casos restantes dan cuenta de unos pocos individuos aislados, identificados como lagartos, serpientes y tortugas (Kligmann, 2009(Kligmann, , 2015Kligmann y Díaz País, 2007;Kligmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified