2017
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w17-31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology –- From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the first hypothesis (Hypothesis 1a), the results indicated that concurrent session-level distress was associated with clients’ linguistic features, such that when clients experienced less distress prior to a session they used fewer first-person singular and negative emotion words, and more positive emotion words in that session. These findings are in line with theoretical views highlighting the role of enhanced self-focus and negative emotions and the lack of positive emotions among individuals who tend to experience high levels of distress (e.g., Blatt, 1995; Shahar et al, 2020) and echo recent reviews (Morales et al, 2017). Unlike previous studies that have mostly been cross-sectional, the current study charted within-client associations between these linguistic features and levels of distress session-by-session across treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with the first hypothesis (Hypothesis 1a), the results indicated that concurrent session-level distress was associated with clients’ linguistic features, such that when clients experienced less distress prior to a session they used fewer first-person singular and negative emotion words, and more positive emotion words in that session. These findings are in line with theoretical views highlighting the role of enhanced self-focus and negative emotions and the lack of positive emotions among individuals who tend to experience high levels of distress (e.g., Blatt, 1995; Shahar et al, 2020) and echo recent reviews (Morales et al, 2017). Unlike previous studies that have mostly been cross-sectional, the current study charted within-client associations between these linguistic features and levels of distress session-by-session across treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hypothesis 2: At the between client level, fewer first-person singular and negative emotion words, and more positive emotion words will be associated with lower levels of distress, both across treatment (2a) as well as at the initial phase of treatment (2b). These hypotheses are consistent with previous studies that indicated associations between these linguistic features and levels of distress at the between-person level (Morales et al, 2017). Because most studies that have described these associations were based on much larger samples (e.g., Coppersmith, Dredze, Harman, Hollingshead, & Mitchell, 2015; Tsugawa et al, 2015) than the number of clients in the current study, 1 these hypotheses will be tested in an exploratory manner.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations