Procedure to describe clavicular motion

Delgado, Guivey Gutierrez; Beule, Matthieu De; Cardentey, Dolgis R. Ortega; Segers, Patrick; Iznaga-Benítez, Arsenio Miguel; Moliner, Tania Rodríguez; Verhegghe, Benedict; Palmans, Tanneke; Hoof, Tom Van; Tongel, Alexander Van

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.009

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This procedure is similar to the one previously proposed by Gutierrez Delgado et al. (2017). To record the position and orientation of the bone coordinate system, each bone was also instrumented with a double dodecahedron made of ArUco markers (Figure 1).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 59%

“…Third, following the ISB recommendations, the x ‐axis of the clavicle should be defined perpendicular to the z ‐axis of the clavicle and the y ‐axis of the thorax (Wu et al., 2005). As the thorax was not available is this study, another approach has been used to define the clavicle coordinate system (Gutierrez Delgado et al., 2017). It results that a rotational offset around the clavicle medial–lateral axis may appear between the approach used in this study and ISB recommendations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For that, the centre of the sternoclavicular joint was used in combination with the anterior border apex of this joint to define the clavicle antero-posterior axis. This procedure is similar to the one previously proposed by Gutierrez Delgado et al (2017). To record the position and orientation of the bone coordinate system, each bone was also instrumented with a double dodecahedron made of ArUco markers (Figure 1).…”

Section: Bonecoordinatesystemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

ArUco‐based stylus reliability for reproductible 3D digitalisation of shoulder cartilage contours

Moissenet,

Elmo Kulanesan,

et al. 2024

Journal of Anatomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Imaging techniques in anatomy have developed rapidly over the last decades through the emergence of various 3D scanning systems. Depending on the dissection level, non‐contact or tactile contact methods can be applied on the targeted structure. The aim of this study was to assess the inter and intra‐observer reproducibility of an ArUco‐based localisation stylus, that is, a manual technique on a hand‐held stylus. Ten fresh–frozen, unembalmed adult arms were used to digitalise the glenoid cartilage related to the glenohumeral joint and the contour of the clavicle cartilage related to the acromioclavicular joint. Three operators performed consecutive digitalisations of each cartilage contour using an ArUco‐based localisation stylus recorded by a single monocular camera. The shape of each cartilage was defined by nine shape parameters. Intra‐observer repeatability and inter‐observer reproducibility were computed using an intra‐class correlation (ICC) for each of these parameters. Overall, 35.2 ± 2.4 s and 26.6 ± 10.2 s were required by each examiner to digitalise the contour of a glenoid and acromioclavicular cartilage, respectively. For most parameters, good‐to‐excellent agreements were observed concerning intra‐observer (ICC ranging between 0.81 and 1.00) and inter‐observer (ICC ranging between 0.75 and 0.99) reproducibility. To conclude, through a fast and versatile process, the use of an ArUco‐based localisation stylus can be a reliable low‐cost alternative to conventional imaging methods to digitalise shoulder cartilage contours.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 59%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Bonecoordinatesystemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation