2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedure for the characterization of radon potential in existing dwellings and to assess the annual average indoor radon concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in general agreement with findings in previous work which used a smaller dataset (N ~ 40 000) and showed that homes with double glazing have radon concentrations 66% higher than those without, similar studies exist in France and Switzerland . Our findings add weight to previous modeling work which showed that the air tightening of the English housing stock could raise radon levels by an average of 57% .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are in general agreement with findings in previous work which used a smaller dataset (N ~ 40 000) and showed that homes with double glazing have radon concentrations 66% higher than those without, similar studies exist in France and Switzerland . Our findings add weight to previous modeling work which showed that the air tightening of the English housing stock could raise radon levels by an average of 57% .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…• The first step consists of the quantification of the soil contaminant mass flux by using a novel "experimental box" that aims to reproduce the behaviour of a real building. The principles of this quantification are based on previous works conducted to assess radon flux from the ground coming into a building [24,25]. • The second step consists of the characterisation of an equivalent homogeneous concentration of the contamination associated with a given depth, using the experimental results obtained with the "experimental box".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative error when comparing the predicted radon concentration to experimental measurement ranged from 4.9 to 21.6%, which compared well with the accuracy of the passive methodology of approximately 25%. Collignan and Powaga 17 further characterised the radon potential in 13 French dwellings and assessed the annual average indoor radon concentration for different meteorological conditions and building characteristics. The study used a computational model to estimate the air renewal within the building and consequently, the indoor radon concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%