1981
DOI: 10.1149/1.2127767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedure for Evaluation of Exchange Current Density and Coverage by an Intermediate at the Reversible Potential in a Process Such as Cl2 Evolution

Abstract: not Available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microkinetic current-voltage relationships for the various cases (slow discharge, slow recombination, slow electrochemical desorption, and slow chemical step) are presented in Table I, based on charge balance considerations for the adsorbed intermediates pertinent to the various cases. These involve coverage, 0 of A~d~ species which can be calculated (9) as follows. Let 0 represent the coverage of A,a~ at the overpotential n and Or that at ~ = 0.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Microkinetic current-voltage relationships for the various cases (slow discharge, slow recombination, slow electrochemical desorption, and slow chemical step) are presented in Table I, based on charge balance considerations for the adsorbed intermediates pertinent to the various cases. These involve coverage, 0 of A~d~ species which can be calculated (9) as follows. Let 0 represent the coverage of A,a~ at the overpotential n and Or that at ~ = 0.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let 0 represent the coverage of A,a~ at the overpotential n and Or that at ~ = 0. A term k~ is defined k, = 0r/1 --Or [9] For case [1], quasi-equilibrium assumption for the step A~d~ + e ~ B yields (0)…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original dimensionally stable anodes were indeed a breakthrough, but there still was a gap in our understanding of how they worked. The Journal records many contributions [49][50][51][52][53] to this understanding ͑which reference is not to slight the tremendous amount of ''understanding'' that was being developed as proprietary information͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%