2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.04.21264525
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedural time reduction associated with active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation

Abstract: Background: Active esophageal cooling is increasingly utilized as an alternative to luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring for protection against thermal injury during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) when treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Published data demonstrate the efficacy of active cooling in reducing thermal injury, but impacts on procedural efficiency are not as well characterized. LET monitoring compels pauses in ablation due to heat stacking and temperature overheating alarms that in turn … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subsequent investigation into the procedural impact of active esophageal cooling has since been published, reporting a mean procedure time reduction of 36 min, or 24.7% of the total procedure time (P < 0.001). 20 Although not powered for further hypothesis testing, the extent and severity of esophageal lesions in actively cooled patients were slightly less than those in control patients receiving intermittent reactive instillation of icecold water in response to temperature elevations. Specifically, the treatment arm cohort included a single ulcer in 1 patient and an erythematous patch in another patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A subsequent investigation into the procedural impact of active esophageal cooling has since been published, reporting a mean procedure time reduction of 36 min, or 24.7% of the total procedure time (P < 0.001). 20 Although not powered for further hypothesis testing, the extent and severity of esophageal lesions in actively cooled patients were slightly less than those in control patients receiving intermittent reactive instillation of icecold water in response to temperature elevations. Specifically, the treatment arm cohort included a single ulcer in 1 patient and an erythematous patch in another patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%